I had a drive fail recently in a 16-drive Rorke Data Galaxy HDX2 system configured as RAID 5. Had a cold swap on hand….popped it in and following a couple of hours of rebuild time, was back up and running full speed. The system works during rebuild but performance slows slightly.
If this had been a RAID 0 striped set, all data would have been lost. I would NEVER trust “lucky.” I have an investment of 6 years of P2 and XDCAM footage, Ae and Pr projects….all still live and editable…..that I intend to keep pushing forward from system to system. Also have LTO/Ultrium tape backup system.
John
From: After Effects Mail List [mailto:AE-List@media-motion.tv] On Behalf Of Mel Matsuoka
Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2011 11:41 AM
To: After Effects Mail List
Subject: Re: [AE] RAID vs non-RAID
I'd rather
manually manage my redundancy (and have successfully for years now)
I think you'll probably change your tune regarding this when your work drive fails in the middle of a project, before you have a chance to invoke your manual process for redundancy :)
I did this for years, and it "worked" for me only because I was lucky. Your drives WILL fail when you least expect it, regardless of how "successful" you've been with manual redundancy procedures in the past. RAID5 setups are so cheap now that it makes no sense to NOT be using a RAID setup these days. Why bother with manual processes, when RAID5 will do it for you automatically, all the time, and for a very reasonable cost?
Mel Matsuoka
Finishing Editor/Director of Awesomeology