Return-Path: Received: from nova.lunarpages.com ([67.210.126.175] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 4569945 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 15:31:37 +0100 Received: from 70.91.57.77-busname-panjde.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([70.91.57.77] helo=[10.1.10.75]) by nova.lunarpages.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RdNIe-0003p1-RR for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 06:37:44 -0800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Subject: Re: [AE] Adobe's new upgrade policy and Creative Cloud licensing model From: James WIlson In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 09:37:39 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: To: "After Effects Mail List" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - nova.lunarpages.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - media-motion.tv X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - jwmm.com Maybe politicians are running things there now :) I can't remember ever getting hired for a job by being just "better than = the alternative", but then I've never ran any negative ads against my = competition. On Dec 20, 2011, at 11:08 PM, Tony Hayes wrote: > you have to wonder how good it really is when the only way they can = make it appear attractive is to make all the other licenses look like = crap