Return-Path: Received: from mail-yw0-f41.google.com ([209.85.213.41] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 4581670 for ae-list@media-motion.tv; Fri, 06 Jan 2012 18:15:35 +0100 Received: by yhgm50 with SMTP id m50so719078yhg.28 for ; Fri, 06 Jan 2012 09:22:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=TASsMWmuiavpW0TFy5MruPYOPDhbMaqxQma6XCf0Kb8=; b=x0l+I3P89oueoH1afYIXSNExRHhYFAKAVpynMHa8ZqJ8xRDBEvrDL5jIjxf39kXUUI X1ElsFrfZRld0VKbe598wLq/KcELf6DWBMuwfbZSj9HBmxBfUP23O6HgjvraPEqUA0Rm e7C0CHpNGEYbvtIFIMNgdylQtPYXnkUbqfMzE= Received: by 10.236.114.132 with SMTP id c4mr8392260yhh.104.1325870537934; Fri, 06 Jan 2012 09:22:17 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from [192.168.0.3] (184-100-218-36.ptld.qwest.net. [184.100.218.36]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 32sm157894686ant.12.2012.01.06.09.22.15 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 06 Jan 2012 09:22:16 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4F072DC3.4020900@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2012 09:22:11 -0800 From: Robert Houghton User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: After Effects Mail List Subject: Re: [AE] Archival Codecs? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit FWIW, A friend of mine and I ran a test on an Avid Symphony regarding Photo-JPEG and noticed a significant gamma level shift in the footage compared to animation codec. As far as I know the files were rendered and treated the same on import in the Avid. I have heard of folks using H.264 at a high bandwidth for archival if file size is an issue. One thing to take into account if you haven't made the jump yet is that BlueRay discs are down to less than $1 a disc now so for archiving that could be an option if you were limited to DVDs earlier. -Rob On Friday, January 06, 2012 8:05:10 AM, Jonathan Penzner wrote: > PhotoJPEG at 95% is one choice. > >>