Mailing List AE-List@media-motion.tv ? Message #41665
From: Carey Dissmore <carey@imugonline.com>
Subject: Re: [AE] The Future of the Mac Pro in Video Post
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 08:16:49 -0600
To: After Effects Mail List <AE-List@media-motion.tv>
Thanks. That is a good read. I updated my post with a link to it. 
And of course I don't agree with everything point of view expressed in the article, but that's not really the point. I think the larger point is that this conversation is still building as the level of investment is pretty significant for many production businesses out there, and we're getting to the point where we're going to know soon, one way or the other, if the Mac Pro (or some new incarnation of it) has a future. 

Carey


On Jan 16, 2012, at 2:14 AM, Chris Zwar wrote:

Hi Carey,

When I saw the subject line I thought you were posting a link to an ArsTechnica article which went up a few hours ago:


Definitely a good read, even if you don't agree with them...


-Chris

On 16/01/2012, at 6:47 PM, Carey Dissmore wrote:


On Jan 16, 2012, at 12:21 AM, Teddy Gage wrote:

Migrating to windows? never left. Won't start down that dark path of discussion though, I've said my peace. Let's just say I won't be buying any $300 thunderbolt USB hubs anytime soon.

However, one sincere question: does thunderbolt have any advantages over USB 3.0?


--
Animator & Editor
www.teddygage.com
Brooklyn



As far as the Windows thing, I think it's safe to say I'm addressing the folks in the business who, like me, are forecasting their next round of investment in gear. Folks who have been traditionally Mac. Personally, I've had a cross-platform shop for a decade, but the last several years has been much more mac-centric. 

Thunderbolt vs. USB 3:
Well, TB's primary advantage is greater speed 10Gbps vs. 5Gbps. Also, it can do full 10Gbps in each direction simultaneously while USB 3 can't. 
Cons: Expensive, currently obscure/minimum penetration.

Thunderbolt, in it's current incarnation (distant future will take it to 100Gbps (40 lanes)-or so they say) is fast enough for most everything, including video capture/output and storage but not enough to fulfill the full-bandwidth speeds for GPUs. Actual real-world benchmarks of the performance impact of running GPU-dependent apps in Thunderbolt chassis do not yet exist, at least that I can find...so all we can talk about right now is the large discrepancy in available bandwidth between 4 and 16 lanes. 

USB 3 is cheap and highly available now, and a pretty good choice for certain things. As Thunderbolt has shown, the list of things a bus can't handle keep getting smaller as the bandwidth increases. 

Carey



 
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to ListMaster