Return-Path: Received: from asbnvacz-mailrelay01.megapath.net ([207.145.128.243] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP id 4589935 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 21:40:01 +0100 Received: from mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.49]) by asbnvacz-mailrelay01.megapath.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0A66A714A6 for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 15:47:02 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail 18439 invoked from network); 16 Jan 2012 20:47:02 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.4.0 ppid: 20951, pid: 11481, t: 0.2559s scanners: clamav: 0.88.2/m:52/d:10739 spam: 3.0.4 Received: from c-24-19-205-131.hsd1.wa.comcast.net (HELO [192.168.1.125]) (albion@[24.19.205.131]) (envelope-sender ) by mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 16 Jan 2012 20:47:02 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Subject: Re: [AE] The Future of the Mac Pro in Video Post From: James Culbertson In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 12:46:54 -0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: To: "After Effects Mail List" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.4 (2005-06-05) on mail5.sea5 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=8.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.0.4 I imagine most video pros will want to stick with a MacPro for at least = one more generation before depending upon Thunderbolt extensively. I'm waiting for the next revision of MacPro before upgrading personally. = Though i can see how iMacs and MacBookPros are becoming more realistic = for intensive video work as time passes. James On Jan 16, 2012, at 12:36 PM, Carey Dissmore wrote: > One thing I have not been able to find any data about is what level of = performance reduction one could expect in apps like Premiere Pro, = Resolve and others that constantly pump video to and from the GPU for = buffering and processing. Just looking at the architecture, it appears 4 = lanes is inadequate.=20 >=20 > Of course with anything computer bus related: There is generally a = larger discrepancy in theoretical bandwidth than real world application = tests. Unfortunately, we don't have any of those as the gear to do them = isn't yet available.=20 >=20 > Maybe there would be a way to gang a couple of Thunderbolt busses = together and get 8 lanes and that would get us over the hump (or close). = But those busses would probably have to be completely dedicated to that = task, not laden down with other devices vying for the bandwidth. All of = this development would come at a very high cost though, when we have a = working, cheap solution with pci express slots on desktop motherboards. = Taking that external without bottlenecking it is the challenge. The = portability premium strikes again. >=20 > Carey >=20 >=20 >=20 > On Jan 16, 2012, at 2:13 PM, Tsassoon wrote: >=20 >> Get a Mini :-) I'd very much like it if nVidia committed to building = a Thunderbolt-attached CUDA engine. >>=20 >>=20 >> Tim Sassoon >> SFD >> Santa Monica, CA >>=20 >> Sent from my iPhone >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> On Jan 16, 2012, at 11:45 AM, Satya G Meka wrote: >>=20 >>> I hate those Glossy screens that come with iMac >>=20 >> +---End of message---+ >> To unsubscribe send any message to >=20 >=20 > +---End of message---+ > To unsubscribe send any message to >=20