Return-Path: Received: from p3plsmtpa06-04.prod.phx3.secureserver.net ([173.201.192.105] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with SMTP id 4601721 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 01:56:33 +0100 Received: (qmail 20822 invoked from network); 20 Jan 2012 01:01:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (173.247.4.230) by p3plsmtpa06-04.prod.phx3.secureserver.net (173.201.192.105) with ESMTP; 20 Jan 2012 01:01:58 -0000 Subject: Output codecs that don't support MP? References: From: Greg Balint Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-A4953F9D-8BE6-450F-8190-E548DDA2235C X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (9A405) In-Reply-To: Message-Id: Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 20:02:13 -0500 To: After Effects Mail List Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) --Apple-Mail-A4953F9D-8BE6-450F-8190-E548DDA2235C Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Hey all. I've spent a good bit of this month upgrading and tweaking my compu= ter's settings to get the most out of multiprocessing in After Effects. =20 I'm currently working on a project that is pretty graphically intensive and i= t's great to get the most out of my hardware.=20 I go to make a final render for my client, who is using AVID for editing, an= d my computer chugs along one frame at a time instead of using multiprocessi= ng for the render. In AE I can RAM preview with full MP support, but this c= odec (DNxHD) and a few others I've found(like QuickTime PNG codec) seem to c= ompletely bypass multiprocessing and end up taking over an hour or more for s= omething that should have only taken 10 minutes or less to render out.=20 Am I completely alone in this? Is there any way around this without spending= more time on the back-end transcoding videos into the codec my client needs= ? Is there some magic setting I can check to use MP on these kinds of codecs? O= r am I stuck in single processor mode? ////Greg Balint ///Art Director / Motion Graphics Designer delRAZOR.com/ On Jan 19, 2012, at 12:08 PM, Byron Nash wrote: > Thanks for all the tips guys. I'm currently evaluating most of the ones su= ggested. I will report back on what we decide to go with. >=20 > On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 3:47 AM, Richard Green wrote: > I like Studiometry. To some it may seem to be a petty problem, but of > all the ones I tried only Studiometry let me create properly styled > invoices rather than sending out something that looks like it came > from a builder's supply merchant. And that same attention to design > applies to all the other reports that it can create. Also has an ios > app that I use when out and about and syncs back to the main program. >=20 > --- > Cheers > Rich >=20 > www.loopcorp.com >=20 > +---End of message---+ > To unsubscribe send any message to >=20 --Apple-Mail-A4953F9D-8BE6-450F-8190-E548DDA2235C Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Hey all. I've spent a good= bit of this month upgrading and tweaking my computer's settings to get the m= ost out of multiprocessing in After Effects.  

I'm currently working on a project that is pretty graphically intensive and= it's great to get the most out of my hardware. 

I go to make a final render for my client, who is using AVID for editing,= and my computer chugs along one frame at a time instead of using multiproce= ssing for the render.   In AE I can RAM preview with full MP support, b= ut this codec (DNxHD) and a few others I've found(like QuickTime PNG codec) s= eem to completely bypass multiprocessing and end up taking over an hour or m= ore for something that should have only taken 10 minutes or less to render o= ut. 

Am I completely alone in this? Is there a= ny way around this without spending more time on the back-end transcoding vi= deos into the codec my client needs?

Is there some m= agic setting I can check to use MP on these kinds of codecs? Or am I stuck i= n single processor mode?

////Greg Balint
///Art Director / Motion= Graphics Designer

On Jan 19, 2012, at 12:08 PM, Byron Nash <byronnash@gmail.com> wrote:

Thanks for all the tips guys. I= 'm currently evaluating most of the ones suggested. I will report back on wh= at we decide to go with.

On Thu, Jan 19, 2= 012 at 3:47 AM, Richard Green <Rich@loopcorp.com> wrote:
I like Studiometry. To some it may seem to be a= petty problem, but of
all the ones I tried only Studiometry let me create properly styled
invoices rather than sending out something that looks like it came
from a builder's supply merchant.  And that same attention to design applies to all the other reports that it can create.  Also has an ios app that I use when out and about and syncs back to the main program.

---
Cheers
Rich

www.loopcorp.com

+---End of message---+
To unsubscribe send any message to <ae-list-off@media-motion.tv>

= --Apple-Mail-A4953F9D-8BE6-450F-8190-E548DDA2235C--