Return-Path: <teddygage@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-bk0-f41.google.com ([209.85.214.41] verified)
  by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10)
  with ESMTP-TLS id 4601780 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 03:43:26 +0100
Received: by bkbzx1 with SMTP id zx1so84146bkb.28
        for <AE-List@media-motion.tv>; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 18:48:53 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=lYscdpDexcnZaDqhNBmL4m0jY+8+RCx9jlTC9nCTkg8=;
        b=rLtqYIOx7HP7MCNNfQTFDtjJC++48B3BHOZjZqPTB+sDGd9hvqhzQrMgGrNvMs/5nS
         VUp9AHKLRpiEvY7HhK9xAhqaE0Vt1vK7OEVqKDDTw6C45BSMTst9alEGM3eMMbfEczZd
         UDNhtn+7lOGkS7iqxMdDw1zxkXZ91kOmnb0EA=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.204.152.7 with SMTP id e7mr8931512bkw.70.1327027733719; Thu,
 19 Jan 2012 18:48:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.204.100.74 with HTTP; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 18:48:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.204.100.74 with HTTP; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 18:48:53 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <list-4601722@media-motion.tv>
References: <list-4601722@media-motion.tv>
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 21:48:53 -0500
Message-ID: <CAPdXPWfxvkkVdzYpJXsZ75QtBYJELzuKg=y-0vbrnMvffNOiFw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [AE] Output codecs that don't support MP?
From: Teddy Gage <teddygage@gmail.com>
To: After Effects Mail List <AE-List@media-motion.tv>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015175df1b0aceb9e04b6ecb856

--0015175df1b0aceb9e04b6ecb856
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Have you tried premiere? I find it does a much better job for
encoding/transcoding footage than ae, esp if you have a cuda enabled card.
It will render h264 fully threaded for me, vs ae which seems finicky as to
which projects will render mt

Also do you have any non mt effects running?
On Jan 19, 2012 8:03 PM, "Greg Balint" <greg@delrazor.com> wrote:

> Hey all. I've spent a good bit of this month upgrading and tweaking my
> computer's settings to get the most out of multiprocessing in After
> Effects.
>
> I'm currently working on a project that is pretty graphically intensive
> and it's great to get the most out of my hardware.
>
> I go to make a final render for my client, who is using AVID for editing,
> and my computer chugs along one frame at a time instead of using
> multiprocessing for the render.   In AE I can RAM preview with full MP
> support, but this codec (DNxHD) and a few others I've found(like QuickTime
> PNG codec) seem to completely bypass multiprocessing and end up taking over
> an hour or more for something that should have only taken 10 minutes or
> less to render out.
>
> Am I completely alone in this? Is there any way around this without
> spending more time on the back-end transcoding videos into the codec my
> client needs?
>
> Is there some magic setting I can check to use MP on these kinds of
> codecs? Or am I stuck in single processor mode?
>
> ////Greg Balint
> ///Art Director / Motion Graphics Designer
> delRAZOR.com/
>
> On Jan 19, 2012, at 12:08 PM, Byron Nash <byronnash@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks for all the tips guys. I'm currently evaluating most of the ones
> suggested. I will report back on what we decide to go with.
>
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 3:47 AM, Richard Green <Rich@loopcorp.com> wrote:
>
>> I like Studiometry. To some it may seem to be a petty problem, but of
>> all the ones I tried only Studiometry let me create properly styled
>> invoices rather than sending out something that looks like it came
>> from a builder's supply merchant.  And that same attention to design
>> applies to all the other reports that it can create.  Also has an ios
>> app that I use when out and about and syncs back to the main program.
>>
>> ---
>> Cheers
>> Rich
>>
>> www.loopcorp.com
>>
>> +---End of message---+
>> To unsubscribe send any message to <ae-list-off@media-motion.tv>
>>
>
>

--0015175df1b0aceb9e04b6ecb856
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<p>Have you tried premiere? I find it does a much better job for encoding/t=
ranscoding footage than ae, esp if you have a cuda enabled card. It will re=
nder h264 fully threaded for me, vs ae which seems finicky as to which proj=
ects will render mt</p>

<p>Also do you have any non mt effects running?</p>
<div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Jan 19, 2012 8:03 PM, &quot;Greg Balint&quot;=
 &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:greg@delrazor.com">greg@delrazor.com</a>&gt; wrote:<=
br type=3D"attribution"><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0=
 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div bgcolor=3D"#FFFFFF"><div>Hey all. I&#39;ve spent a good bit of this mo=
nth upgrading and tweaking my computer&#39;s settings to get the most out o=
f multiprocessing in After Effects. =A0</div><div><br></div><div>I&#39;m cu=
rrently working on a project that is pretty graphically intensive and it&#3=
9;s great to get the most out of my hardware.=A0</div>
<div><br></div><div>I go to make a final render for my client, who is using=
 AVID for editing, and my computer chugs along one frame at a time instead =
of using multiprocessing for the render. =A0 In AE I can RAM preview with f=
ull MP support, but this codec (DNxHD) and a few others I&#39;ve found(like=
 QuickTime PNG codec) seem to completely bypass multiprocessing and end up =
taking over an hour or more for something that should have only taken 10 mi=
nutes or less to render out.=A0</div>
<div><br></div><div>Am I completely alone in this? Is there any way around =
this without spending more time on the back-end transcoding videos into the=
 codec my client needs?</div><div><br></div><div>Is there some magic settin=
g I can check to use MP on these kinds of codecs? Or am I stuck in single p=
rocessor mode?<br>
<br>////Greg Balint<div>///Art Director / Motion Graphics Designer</div><di=
v><a href=3D"http://delRAZOR.com/" target=3D"_blank">delRAZOR.com/</a></div=
></div><div><br>On Jan 19, 2012, at 12:08 PM, Byron Nash &lt;<a href=3D"mai=
lto:byronnash@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">byronnash@gmail.com</a>&gt; wrot=
e:<br>
<br></div><div></div><blockquote type=3D"cite"><div>Thanks for all the tips=
 guys. I&#39;m currently evaluating most of the ones suggested. I will repo=
rt back on what we decide to go with.<br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On =
Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 3:47 AM, Richard Green <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=
=3D"mailto:Rich@loopcorp.com" target=3D"_blank">Rich@loopcorp.com</a>&gt;</=
span> wrote:<br>


<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p=
x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">I like Studiometry. To some it may seem to b=
e a petty problem, but of<br>
all the ones I tried only Studiometry let me create properly styled<br>
invoices rather than sending out something that looks like it came<br>
from a builder&#39;s supply merchant. =A0And that same attention to design<=
br>
applies to all the other reports that it can create. =A0Also has an ios<br>
app that I use when out and about and syncs back to the main program.<br>
<br>
---<br>
Cheers<br>
Rich<br>
<br>
<a href=3D"http://www.loopcorp.com" target=3D"_blank">www.loopcorp.com</a><=
br>
<div><div><br>
+---End of message---+<br>
To unsubscribe send any message to &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:ae-list-off@media-=
motion.tv" target=3D"_blank">ae-list-off@media-motion.tv</a>&gt;<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>
</div></blockquote></div></blockquote></div>

--0015175df1b0aceb9e04b6ecb856--