Return-Path: Received: from mail-tul01m020-f169.google.com ([209.85.214.169] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 4602131 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 13:02:02 +0100 Received: by obbta7 with SMTP id ta7so631560obb.28 for ; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 04:07:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=8EIfCWW9CuXmd/sJSjBtqoIywSjBUKvUjnXxHqiDHqY=; b=GUxE019i+wW7UFq6wWn0+nBo0RSe9zxrJaeBb2MuMK4j7unrtBd42SU6BWdt6nr2hT UP5T+I9lWAfG1MUwSkK0O+C0TZDOu1ON9FLqlVnQrkc/fJH8YlK9l+fWobEvVXaCJ1sX MBO5VAwJxMSaKZY2wmCdoQkLfGy/9OUF3IsqM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.187.37 with SMTP id fp5mr26444373obc.21.1327061248638; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 04:07:28 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.182.116.105 with HTTP; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 04:07:28 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 13:07:28 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [AE] The Future of the Mac Pro in Video Post From: yuke To: After Effects Mail List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=14dae9399e0d52003404b6f48688 --14dae9399e0d52003404b6f48688 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I'm probably not informed enough, so let me ask: Maybe they're just waiting for a sensibly faster processor/chipset configuration? Why should they redesign the formfactor? What's wrong with the "drilled-aluminium" and how should it be bettered? On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 9:14 AM, Chris Zwar wrote: > Hi Carey, > > When I saw the subject line I thought you were posting a link to an > ArsTechnica article which went up a few hours ago: > > > http://arstechnica.com/apple/news/2012/01/video-pros-apple-needs-to-acknowledge-the-pro-industry-and-fast.ars > > Definitely a good read, even if you don't agree with them... > > > -Chris > > On 16/01/2012, at 6:47 PM, Carey Dissmore wrote: > --14dae9399e0d52003404b6f48688 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I'm probably not informed enough, so let me ask:=A0
Mayb= e they're just waiting for a sensibly faster processor/chipset configur= ation?
Why should they redesign the formfactor? What's wrong = with the "drilled-aluminium" and how=A0should it be bettered?


On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 9:14 AM= , Chris Zwar <c= hris@chriszwar.com> wrote:
Hi Carey,

When I saw= the subject line I thought you were posting a link to an ArsTechnica artic= le which went up a few hours ago:


Definitely a good read, even if you don't agree wit= h them...


-Chris

On 16/01/2012, at 6:47 PM, Carey Dissmore wrote:
--14dae9399e0d52003404b6f48688--