Return-Path: <hedczech@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-gy0-f169.google.com ([209.85.160.169] verified)
  by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10)
  with ESMTP-TLS id 4616486 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Sat, 04 Feb 2012 20:46:08 +0100
Received: by ghrr18 with SMTP id r18so2241832ghr.28
        for <AE-List@media-motion.tv>; Sat, 04 Feb 2012 11:52:04 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date
         :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type;
        bh=9vgBXrZCDg1xniiMz9lFR7ugzzoQKLAFzryWbI+ajvY=;
        b=vsZrDk0e3mBHbgxgldZC9xAosD3fqC63/342ji3jC1ZB2PoKPPGvhiT+Iu3eEkZ+Bn
         05Ypc+1ziDQhH0xhPW+Jc6zha2RuYfIdBYxh5LEOnptbE7GZGJ+CJCjOGGrGdc1k/8kQ
         Efl3+8Ta1zZ4XaoUjvFP3N5TWOvvUtlWFCcxY=
Received: by 10.236.184.167 with SMTP id s27mr18013042yhm.8.1328385124066;
 Sat, 04 Feb 2012 11:52:04 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: hedczech@gmail.com
Received: by 10.236.48.132 with HTTP; Sat, 4 Feb 2012 11:51:21 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <list-4616477@media-motion.tv>
References: <list-4616477@media-motion.tv>
From: "scott.aelist" <scott.aelist@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2012 11:51:21 -0800
X-Google-Sender-Auth: k8ClAgwV6qXKv9d9TM9cVoQ3Zjg
Message-ID: <CAOoNOO33SYNcs9BtB_g64QithEKd3Czy8iGnyWLq2qKwJ2ciUg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [AE] **** You Adobe - (Censored)
To: After Effects Mail List <AE-List@media-motion.tv>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf303f6acc71e6d804b828c3e7

--20cf303f6acc71e6d804b828c3e7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 11:25 AM, Ren P <fantigua@comcast.net> wrote:

> All valid points, but I think we need to look at the Bigger Picture here.
> We
> cannot continue down the path of buying new machines every year or two for
> such updates.
>

I think this is a fact of life when you live in a first world country. The
cost of refurbishing an existing a computer is more expensive than simply
buying an new one when you factor in the cost of labor. That and the fact
that the PC computer industry is based on the model of built-in
obsolescence. But i think in a few years you'll be working from a dumb
terminal and all of the processing will be happening in the cloud... In
that case this will cease to be an issue.

--20cf303f6acc71e6d804b828c3e7
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 11:25 AM, Ren P <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mai=
lto:fantigua@comcast.net">fantigua@comcast.net</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><di=
v class=3D"gmail_quote"><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0=
 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">

All valid points, but I think we need to look at the Bigger Picture here. W=
e<br>
cannot continue down the path of buying new machines every year or two for<=
br>
such updates.<br></blockquote><div><br>I think this is a fact of life when =
you live in a first world country. The cost of refurbishing an existing a c=
omputer is more expensive than simply buying an new one when you factor in =
the cost of labor. That and the fact that the PC computer industry is based=
 on the model of built-in obsolescence. But i think in a few years you&#39;=
ll be working from a dumb terminal and all of the processing will be happen=
ing in the cloud... In that case this will cease to be an issue.<br>

</div></div>

--20cf303f6acc71e6d804b828c3e7--