Return-Path: Received: from mail-pz0-f41.google.com ([209.85.210.41] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 4620336 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:36:18 +0100 Received: by dadv6 with SMTP id v6so563620dad.28 for ; Wed, 08 Feb 2012 07:42:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:message-id:cc:x-mailer:from:subject:date:to; bh=NACvkf/Sl4hM8sJZ7Pi1hPIjReMT4nyUHQc/35+Rn8U=; b=ZNTd1zNE1HpHiaTw4HJaPyWPbeNawsvVebbxFTXX/PYq951760WAlacnFYnhjmLrbg hP9r+4Bs9vj2YkpBYo19QXA2w3l9unw+qmIL1sX7nEOQumnG6IqJBBsQJzTZaADSL/9V DF0Tehk+KVUcedwcRrALx2TgZjHirybH1IaDQ= Received: by 10.68.223.68 with SMTP id qs4mr69381871pbc.112.1328715740337; Wed, 08 Feb 2012 07:42:20 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from [10.0.1.4] (c-76-121-7-248.hsd1.wa.comcast.net. [76.121.7.248]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x8sm4033847pbr.11.2012.02.08.07.42.18 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 08 Feb 2012 07:42:18 -0800 (PST) References: In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-F67F52DA-2234-4DA8-9539-F35C2D232E1B Message-Id: <4D41F693-B2E5-4810-B4D0-5A612494DB49@gmail.com> Cc: After Effects Mail List X-Mailer: iPad Mail (9A405) From: Dan Ramirez Subject: Re: [AE] F*k You Adobe Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2012 07:42:17 -0800 To: After Effects Mail List --Apple-Mail-F67F52DA-2234-4DA8-9539-F35C2D232E1B Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii I'm curious too.=20 On Feb 8, 2012, at 7:29 AM, "Glenn Ferguson" w= rote: > Could you please elaborate on that statement? >=20 > From: brand standard > Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2012 8:40 AM > To: After Effects Mail List > Subject: Re: [AE] F*k You Adobe >=20 > historically, adobe has always seemed vulnerable to corruption. it's the= one thing that keeps me away from premiere.=20 > From: joe cafe > To: After Effects Mail List =20 > Sent: Wednesday, February 8, 2012 6:55 AM > Subject: Re: [AE] F*k You Adobe >=20 > I've had no problems with my ppc browser. > Once again, for 99% of the population, the needs of the family has priorit= y over spending thousands for new hardware to watch Flash movs on the web. > If you want video to be seen by everybody, Flash is best avoided. >=20 > On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 5:09 AM, Tony Hayes wrote: > if Joe had a 6-7 year old PC he'd have no problems installing the latest v= ersion of flash. >=20 >=20 >=20 --Apple-Mail-F67F52DA-2234-4DA8-9539-F35C2D232E1B Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
I'm curious too. 

On Feb 8, 2012, at 7:29 AM, "Glenn Ferguson" <ferguson.design@verizon.net> wrote:

Could you please elaborate on that statement?

Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2012 8:40 AM
Subject: Re: [AE] F*k You Adobe

historically, adobe has always seemed vulnerable to corruption.   it's the one thing that keeps me away from premiere.
From: joe cafe <cafe.joe@gmail.com>
To: After Effects Mail List <AE-List@media-motion.tv>
Sent: Wednesday, February 8, 2012 6:55 AM
Subject: Re: [AE] F*k You Adobe

I've had no problems with my ppc browser.
Once again, for 99% of the population, the needs of the family has priority over spending thousands for new hardware to watch Flash movs on the web.
If you want video to be seen by everybody, Flash is best avoided.

On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 5:09 AM, Tony Hayes <tony@cleverbits.com> wrote:
if Joe had a 6-7 year old PC he'd have no problems installing the latest version of flash.



--Apple-Mail-F67F52DA-2234-4DA8-9539-F35C2D232E1B--