Return-Path: Received: from oproxy1-pub.bluehost.com ([66.147.249.253] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with SMTP id 4620683 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Wed, 08 Feb 2012 23:46:15 +0100 Received: (qmail 12996 invoked by uid 0); 8 Feb 2012 22:52:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO box473.bluehost.com) (74.220.219.73) by oproxy1.bluehost.com with SMTP; 8 Feb 2012 22:52:18 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=helium14.com; s=default; h=To:References:Message-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Date:In-Reply-To:From:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type; bh=Zm95Ly78qrecpnS2/+PMz9MykuNuM9mfLo5+hpF1dvY=; b=uN3QNXRS4YjGkWeKkMWPT9jW0IwbJ8Pjw5wMCr+tk9FXnY/LPFOXHGo4YVxisX2IGjCdSXeO6wNepuKf19dDgdL6hPBGchbLFnnLHwQbR3M2T8PhmWkWfvxV1WmCG2zf; Received: from [108.60.36.34] (helo=[192.168.20.47]) by box473.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RvGN8-00024f-5Z for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Wed, 08 Feb 2012 15:52:18 -0700 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257) Subject: Re: [AE] Love You Adobe From: Eric James Wood In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2012 14:52:15 -0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <72E1BA52-F864-479C-A26D-F5F6FEDA93F9@helium14.com> References: To: "After Effects Mail List" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257) X-Identified-User: {1790:box473.bluehost.com:heliumon:helium14.com} {sentby:smtp auth 108.60.36.34 authed with list@helium14.com} you scribbled: > Thanks James. > So just to clarify what I thought I saw during the FCPX rollout, one = of the "selling points" in the demo that I watched was that "now all = this rendering can occur in the background during low-use CPU cycles." = If that means a background encode/render to a ProRes or other proxy is = going on in the background, then that is still not "working with files = natively" in my book. Premiere has no background render processes that = occur automatically unless the user starts a render process for = exporting. In Pr, with a system like mine, no rendering ever needs to = occur in the background. All native files stay native and do not change = during the edit. It is a preference if you would like to transcode to proRes to work = faster, etc in the timeline. I have premiere running on an approved cuda = card, and trust me, there is rendering going on still, but on the card. = Yes the card is fast, but it still has to render stuff. I think your mixing up rendering with transcoding. When i output my = timeline that has native dslr footage, with AE comps in there, and color = correction in PPro, it takes time to get a final file out. It is not a = couple of seconds. I went thru this with adobe last year, take some prores clips and throw = it into a PPro timeline and export to the same codec as your source. It = takes time. Ppro deals with all codecs as cracking them open and getting = to the data inside, that is why it works with everything under the sun = really well. Now take a proRes clip in fcp 7 or X and do the same thing, it will = export a file wicked fast to the same codec as the source since it is = just a file copy. Ppro DOES NOT do a simple file copy, but actually deals with the data = differently. Now doing it in fcp is a two step process in the real world, you export = a DI in ProRes then have to make a h.264 for web delivery, where in = PPro, i just go straight to the h.264 file since it takes so long to = make the proRes file, then make the h.264 file. It is two different ways of working is all. My hangup is that if you = make a 1hr movie, with lots of edits, effects, titles, AE comps, etc. = Normally i would export a DI master, then use that to strike any = delivery format i would need. PPro i tend to export the timeline more times than exporting a DI = master. --=20 Helium14 | www.helium14.com Design | Motion + Graphic www.helium14.com 'the next best thing to knowing something, is knowing where to find it'