|
|
My guess is that this isn't on Mac or with Long-GOP material, because my take is that Adobe hasn't lived up to the claims of native editing on this platform. I still transcode to ProRes if I need to get work done in a time frame I can manage. Half the time I scrub in Pr with Long-GOP, the video doesn't update, either at all, or at a rate above 2 FPS.
A lot of long form docs and low budget features are being shot on H264 / MPEG, and I doubt you're going to see many claims that they're cutting native on a Mac with Pr. Sounds like a recipe for Seppuku.
I really want to love Pr, and I do for ProRes and DVCProHD editing. But, I noticed I swear a lot more when trying to either edit native, or edit using my AJA card. I hope these get the same respect that Pr Windows users get when CS6 comes out (or before would be nice, too!).
On Feb 8, 2012, at 1:17 PM, Todd Kopriva wrote:
>> Is Premiere being used for long-form documentary and Feature work?
>
> Yes. _Act of Valor_ and _Monsters_ spring to mind as recent examples.
>
>
>> Is it ever used for Broadcast work?
>
> Yes. The BBC, Hearst, Turner, and several other organizations have moved to using it on some or all of their projects.
>
> There are a lot of customer success stories on the Adobe website. Here's a link to one:
> www.adobe.com/cfusion/showcase/index.cfm?event=casestudydetail&casestudyid=1097986
>
>
>> I got called in about a month ago to finish up a short 3 minute
>> corporate piece started by a communications manager. Seemed quite
>> stable and snappy compared to my minor foray's into Premiere in years
>> past.
>
>
> +---End of message---+
> To unsubscribe send any message to <ae-list-off@media-motion.tv>
|
|