Return-Path: Received: from mout.perfora.net ([74.208.4.194] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP id 4621550 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:11:57 +0100 Received: from [10.1.1.22] (71-13-195-18.static.eucl.wi.charter.com [71.13.195.18]) by mrelay.perfora.net (node=mrus3) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0M3iQL-1Smqc51ho1-00roO1; Thu, 09 Feb 2012 14:18:01 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257) Subject: Re: [AE] Premiere Pro [branched from previous thread] From: Steve Oakley In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 13:17:59 -0600 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <6A40E672-4B49-4C49-9E01-CDBEB1B55B40@practicali.com> References: To: "After Effects Mail List" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257) X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:xcgqmK8AvBmbDlRjSZSt1djZ8RBq7XUqN3zCOZaDtmE 0G1SJ5jMdLcJD2eOEJNCwZRIoWPfmgoipRlcK1KjDFWwybeIQ7 Mzh/+4/xJxoWZ1q2ahqc777lugSB7JJDUuksp8ik903LwsOyKK nJeX1TVDh7OjR9vaqhl3zuerDdsYspj2Yj+1K8ktliXqop1PE2 vDI6qXIGTrf1Ax/L+z4UqtxXR3VoHqzrYmMtUlWhn2+d6prubd 3J18TRLz4yfCqcYaTU/CRSwCsxFSssuNhx3IZFAxq7TdFuamRu aoKfd73sTejdM1woJcbXnhlXPU5xC8gISV62dTrhqMyDnjNqZ5 5a4Gyr6ES+HXy69GbWzJz0eGyOwwQAUcpKeKoo4EelIu7bpdeH wbJBMIe1L5RiQ== are you always using AJA sequences ? can you do a quick test ? create a = desktop / custom sequence that doesn't do I/O to the AJA and see what = you get. I'm suspecting it should be good and thinking it might be the = AJA driver overhead... well thats my thought anyway. worth a quick test. = =20 also do you have your CUDA drivers updates ? do you have a single Q4000 card ? or 2 cards - one for displays, one for = CUDA ? if you check "Use Previews" ( on by default ) in export PP should not = need to formally render. it will use either any actual render files from = the TL and just use CUDA to generate the frames on the fly just like = playback. that should vastly increase your render times. steve o On Feb 9, 2012, at 8:46 AM, Jim Curtis wrote: > Hmm... I've had 32G RAM in my MacPro3,1 since I bought it. I have = latest drivers, average 1GB/s reads from my RAID, updated Pr 5.5.2, OS = 10.6.8. >=20 > I posted last night that I just got one H.264 720 clip in that scrubs = well. It's the only clip in the project, and I'm wondering now if that = is a clue. Most of the time, I have dozens of clips in a project. This = was the first Long-GOP that allowed me to scrub like intraframe. =20 >=20 > I'm juggling a few projects now. One has all .mp4 and .MTS files, and = a bunch of JPEG stills, and they're a nightmare. Scrubbing is almost = futile. >=20 > I loaded up the trial of Avid MC6, and using AMA, I get beautiful = smooth scrubbing, even to the monitor through my Kona LHi with all the = types of media that work with AMA. The difference is night and day. >=20 >=20 >=20 > On Feb 9, 2012, at 2:40 AM, Gary Berendsen wrote: >=20 >> On a macpro 2009 with 32GB here with osx and win7, PP works exactly = the same. Previews the same, I just found some codec options different = between the 2 os's. Have no problems with scrubbing etc. Only time I = experienced that recently is on a stage design job i was doing and = running PP and AE at the same time on my MBP 2011 with 8 GB which would = cause problems with dynamic linking and the playback in AE and PP = especially which app had control of the hardware on the tower no = problems. What I have found that most PP probs seem to be due to low = RAM. I do however hit render a lot in PP but that is more a habit so it = all plays well, I also do that in FCP. >>=20 >> gary >>=20 >> On 2/8/2012 10:19 PM, Jim Curtis wrote: >>> My guess is that this isn't on Mac or with Long-GOP material, = because my take is that Adobe hasn't lived up to the claims of native = editing on this platform. I still transcode to ProRes if I need to get = work done in a time frame I can manage. Half the time I scrub in Pr = with Long-GOP, the video doesn't update, either at all, or at a rate = above 2 FPS. >>>=20 >>> A lot of long form docs and low budget features are being shot on = H264 / MPEG, and I doubt you're going to see many claims that they're = cutting native on a Mac with Pr. Sounds like a recipe for Seppuku. >>>=20 >>> I really want to love Pr, and I do for ProRes and DVCProHD editing. = But, I noticed I swear a lot more when trying to either edit native, or = edit using my AJA card. I hope these get the same respect that Pr = Windows users get when CS6 comes out (or before would be nice, too!). >>>=20 >>>=20 >>> On Feb 8, 2012, at 1:17 PM, Todd Kopriva wrote: >>>=20 >>>>> Is Premiere being used for long-form documentary and Feature work? >>>> Yes. _Act of Valor_ and _Monsters_ spring to mind as recent = examples. >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>>> Is it ever used for Broadcast work? >>>> Yes. The BBC, Hearst, Turner, and several other organizations have = moved to using it on some or all of their projects. >>>>=20 >>>> There are a lot of customer success stories on the Adobe website. = Here's a link to one: >>>> = www.adobe.com/cfusion/showcase/index.cfm?event=3Dcasestudydetail&casestudy= id=3D1097986 >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>>> I got called in about a month ago to finish up a short 3 minute >>>>> corporate piece started by a communications manager. Seemed quite >>>>> stable and snappy compared to my minor foray's into Premiere in = years >>>>> past. >>>>=20 >>>> +---End of message---+ >>>> To unsubscribe send any message to >>>=20 >>> +---End of message---+ >>> To unsubscribe send any message to >>=20 >> --=20 >> gary berendsen >> http://garyberendsen.com >> VFX generalist >>=20 >>=20 >> +---End of message---+ >> To unsubscribe send any message to >=20 >=20 > +---End of message---+ > To unsubscribe send any message to