Return-Path: Received: from mail-iy0-f169.google.com ([209.85.210.169] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 4624749 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 18:03:20 +0100 Received: by iagz16 with SMTP id z16so4752153iag.28 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 09:09:31 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.42.155.70 with SMTP id t6mr23404799icw.11.1329152971662; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 09:09:31 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from [192.168.1.226] (c-71-63-186-29.hsd1.mn.comcast.net. [71.63.186.29]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id np10sm21458215igc.0.2012.02.13.09.09.30 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 13 Feb 2012 09:09:30 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257) Subject: Re: [AE] 720 or 1080 From: Carey Dissmore In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 11:09:29 -0600 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <3F8FF9B6-5EE6-41FD-91BC-257D6EC9A131@imugonline.com> References: To: "After Effects Mail List" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257) X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkw140g5q6R7DcFV+SBtmhsuRfKotw8khB+AEW3Shuw2UHycscnj4+S0Psqa0F3xpslzZBt It's true working in 720p is lighter and faster. Heck it's about 900,000 = pixels vs. 2.2 million in that frame.=20 Having said that, working with 720p in editorial and mastering seems = like a bad idea to me, unless you are absolutely certain you are okay = with the future limitations of that.=20 Even though 720 gives room for Pan and Scan of 1080p, you can certainly = scale up 1080p in a 1080p timeline, especially when you know you are = going to drop it back to 720p on delivery. It's a wash. (stick to 150% = and below scale if you want perfect pixel-matching in 720p). Also, using = Premiere Pro when you need to go larger takes advantage of the best = scaler in the NLE universe. Better than AE, in fact.=20 When it comes right down to it, if I shot 1080p I prefer to master = everything 1080p then go to work on deliverables. For example, for = broadcast 1080 they're going to want 1080i/29.97 (aka 60i). For 1080p = that's simply a PsF maneuver in your encoder. Perhaps adding pulldown if = you started with a 24P master. For 720p it's always progressive so just stay with it. If they don't = like native frame rates you may have to pad out to 60p (that's the 720p = baseline deliverable).=20 Carey On Feb 13, 2012, at 11:00 AM, Jim Curtis wrote: > I've got a series of spots coming up. After years of SD deliverables, = client has requested we start finishing HD versions. =20 >=20 > DG FastChannel will accept 720 or 1080. =20 >=20 > Seems to me that finishing in 720 is the quickest way to delivery. It = gives me some room to pan & scan with 1080 material, rendering to 720 is = faster, and my storage and backup will be easier. Seems like a slam = dunk case for finishing 720. >=20 > But... to those of you who can shed some light... Am I missing = anything by not finishing in 1080? >=20 > Thanks, > Jim C. >=20 > . >=20 >=20 > +---End of message---+ > To unsubscribe send any message to