Return-Path: Received: from mail-yx0-f169.google.com ([209.85.213.169] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 4624756 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 18:04:07 +0100 Received: by yenl5 with SMTP id l5so2512112yen.28 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 09:10:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=6YBvAHLpNXXTyRFldJ1fvN9RCRjQosGo9SQGjA+RbuM=; b=ry9kKH8eFCpgR4E9UZM0/gr963e3E/i1QqAOfiojwfSrI0a0BCkIRB/tORdq50JwD+ FhiKBvfnynjbO/ZLhDv6GQqWNje6MLJbbbA1Xa28327iBCPwMKqZJCP1YFcJ9L0jt8ox dc+KNX4pPk1QEWdlM0KOpCBJfyl6zN7gR+uss= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.44.68 with SMTP id c4mr12163873obm.5.1329153019199; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 09:10:19 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.182.39.198 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 09:10:19 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.182.39.198 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 09:10:19 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 12:10:19 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [AE] 720 or 1080 From: Teddy Gage To: After Effects Mail List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d04479fa18fc08d04b8db8d7c --f46d04479fa18fc08d04b8db8d7c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I will always go 720 unless they specify 1080 for two reasons: the rendering overhead adds up over time, and few clients have displays that really show a difference between 720 and 1080. Honestly on a display under 36" its not worth it for the added effort and time to render. Not to mention increased disk space for storage On Feb 13, 2012 12:02 PM, "Jim Curtis" wrote: > I've got a series of spots coming up. After years of SD deliverables, > client has requested we start finishing HD versions. > > DG FastChannel will accept 720 or 1080. > > Seems to me that finishing in 720 is the quickest way to delivery. It > gives me some room to pan & scan with 1080 material, rendering to 720 is > faster, and my storage and backup will be easier. Seems like a slam dunk > case for finishing 720. > > But... to those of you who can shed some light... Am I missing anything by > not finishing in 1080? > > Thanks, > Jim C. > > . > > > +---End of message---+ > To unsubscribe send any message to > --f46d04479fa18fc08d04b8db8d7c Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I will always go 720 unless they specify 1080 for two reasons: the rende= ring overhead adds up over time, and few clients have displays that really = show a difference between 720 and 1080. Honestly on a display under 36"= ; its not worth it for the added effort and time to render. Not to mention = increased disk space for storage

On Feb 13, 2012 12:02 PM, "Jim Curtis"= <jpcurtis@me.com> wrote:
I've got a series of spots coming up. =A0After years of SD deliverables= , client has requested we start finishing HD versions.

DG FastChannel will accept 720 or 1080.

Seems to me that finishing in 720 is the quickest way to delivery. =A0It gi= ves me some room to pan & scan with 1080 material, rendering to 720 is = faster, and my storage and backup will be easier. =A0Seems like a slam dunk= case for finishing 720.

But... to those of you who can shed some light... Am I missing anything by = not finishing in 1080?

Thanks,
Jim C.

.


+---End of message---+
To unsubscribe send any message to <ae-list-off@media-motion.tv>
--f46d04479fa18fc08d04b8db8d7c--