Return-Path: Received: from smtpoutwbe03.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net ([208.109.78.114] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with SMTP id 4624778 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 18:36:24 +0100 Received: (qmail 19321 invoked from network); 13 Feb 2012 17:42:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) (72.167.218.140) by smtpoutwbe03.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net with SMTP; 13 Feb 2012 17:42:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 12731 invoked by uid 99); 13 Feb 2012 17:42:36 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-Originating-IP: 75.83.206.115 User-Agent: Workspace Webmail 5.6.12 Message-Id: <20120213104235.89259f98f291d771214680e8971719cb.72591dc899.wbe@email04.secureserver.net> From: "Robert W. Walker" To: "After Effects Mail List" Subject: RE: [AE] 720 or 1080 Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 10:42:35 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 Many stations, cablers and networks require 1080. I would not leave it=0At= o DG to do the upscaling in those cases. We always finish in 1080;=0Adowns= caling is always preferable to upscaling no matter how it's done.=0A=0AChec= k the technical requirements of the last link in the chain, past DG,=0Aif p= ossible.=0A=0ARobert W. Walker=0ALos Angeles=0A=0A> -------- Original Messa= ge --------=0A> Subject: Re: [AE] 720 or 1080=0A> From: Teddy Gage =0A> Date: Mon, February 13, 2012 12:10 pm=0A> To: "After Effe= cts Mail List" =0A> =0A> =0A> I will always go 720= unless they specify 1080 for two reasons: the=0A> rendering overhead adds = up over time, and few clients have displays that=0A> really show a differen= ce between 720 and 1080. Honestly on a display under=0A> 36" its not worth = it for the added effort and time to render. Not to=0A> mention increased di= sk space for storage=0A> On Feb 13, 2012 12:02 PM, "Jim Curtis" wrote:=0A> =0A> > I've got a series of spots coming up. After years= of SD deliverables,=0A> > client has requested we start finishing HD versi= ons.=0A> >=0A> > DG FastChannel will accept 720 or 1080.=0A> >=0A> > Seems = to me that finishing in 720 is the quickest way to delivery. It=0A> > give= s me some room to pan & scan with 1080 material, rendering to 720 is=0A> > = faster, and my storage and backup will be easier. Seems like a slam dunk= =0A> > case for finishing 720.=0A> >=0A> > But... to those of you who can s= hed some light... Am I missing anything by=0A> > not finishing in 1080?=0A>= >=0A> > Thanks,=0A> > Jim C.=0A> >=0A> > .=0A> >=0A> >=0A> > +---End of me= ssage---+=0A> > To unsubscribe send any message to =0A> >=0A