Return-Path: Received: from imr-da03.mx.aol.com ([205.188.105.145] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP id 4649519 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Thu, 08 Mar 2012 19:49:45 +0100 Received: from mtaout-da04.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtaout-da04.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.51.132]) by imr-da03.mx.aol.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id q28IuZXv028615 for ; Thu, 8 Mar 2012 13:56:35 -0500 Received: from broom.home (pool-108-23-214-125.lsanca.fios.verizon.net [108.23.214.125]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mtaout-da04.r1000.mx.aol.com (MUA/Third Party Client Interface) with ESMTPSA id E1157E000083; Thu, 8 Mar 2012 13:56:34 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: [AE] PS Touch Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_29D5149F-C026-425A-A6C6-F52785D7E0F7" From: Tim Sassoon In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2012 10:56:33 -0800 Cc: Tim Sassoon Message-Id: <57895073-79FE-48A8-AC70-45B001F6DAE0@aol.com> References: To: "After Effects Mail List" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257) x-aol-global-disposition: G DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20110426; t=1331232995; bh=6asEt17e2b7p4OS5pSABV9O8XJrtoMXOYl0UVvtlQf8=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-Id:Date:Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=KmzZKf2P/wZfRs1OOjzBG4SgoL27kCkLtC7eAtxYO0AftX+XEVwJfCuW1ZtwhBpNW QJpSsZ3lp0IBzR2e1w13HZ8oXIdxYCXlC/xYSYJXGzDHD2RclBhjRHW99l44+MBwGX h9lH7xWYWmyYl6/6B56M1ro5yezGMpW/IuaB3GWM= X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:345137088:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d33844f5900e237b2 X-AOL-IP: 108.23.214.125 --Apple-Mail=_29D5149F-C026-425A-A6C6-F52785D7E0F7 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii A. The 2K resolution was widely reported, and B. it was a no-brainer = that the camera would be at least parity if not identical to the iPhone = 4S, which has been out for months. It's incredible to me that the bar = would've been set lower than the internal camera's resolution. IMHO = their entire iOS business is a mess, and someone needs to straighten it = out. The only one of them that IMHO is worth a crap is lowly Acrobat = Reader. I'm going to look on their org chart to see if I can spot the = Pointy-Haired Boss. I'm also quite disturbed that so many apps are being designed for the = iPad ONLY, not for all iOS devices equally. This is a VERY short-sighted = trend that Apple needs to do something about ASAP. Tim Sassoon SFD Santa Monica, CA On Mar 8, 2012, at 10:48 AM, Jim Feeley wrote: > to comply in some what with a request from Apple to not tip folks off = to (or rather, confirm) the higher resolution of the new iPad --Apple-Mail=_29D5149F-C026-425A-A6C6-F52785D7E0F7 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii A. The 2K resolution was widely reported, and B. it was a no-brainer that the camera would be at least parity if not identical to the iPhone 4S, which has been out for months. It's incredible to me that the bar would've been set lower than the internal camera's resolution. IMHO their entire iOS business is a mess, and someone needs to straighten it out. The only one of them that IMHO is worth a crap is lowly Acrobat Reader. I'm going to look on their org chart to see if I can spot the Pointy-Haired Boss.

I'm also quite disturbed that so many apps are being designed for the iPad ONLY, not for all iOS devices equally. This is a VERY short-sighted trend that Apple needs to do something about ASAP.

Tim Sassoon

SFD

Santa Monica, CA

On Mar 8, 2012, at 10:48 AM, Jim Feeley wrote:

to comply in some what with a request from Apple to not tip folks off to (or rather, confirm) the higher resolution of the new iPad

--Apple-Mail=_29D5149F-C026-425A-A6C6-F52785D7E0F7--