Return-Path: Received: from mail-yw0-f41.google.com ([209.85.213.41] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 4652454 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 04:34:26 +0100 Received: by yhr47 with SMTP id 47so2207942yhr.28 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 20:41:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=S7qrHasNTE6ptfACosQn5S/J0U1mxGsrgy3ZAPDEbns=; b=eB4opVwSUUjSyHeGuVvT4a+9fm62v4oa7wYh35niAnNYauzZYd/aLon12+Abbs9Sge 8Eq7Jl0U0mbrI81jSAKBCIbzgsisCxAnjbEg6/kbjZi6MlrOA8DpWBkdyco6u25t3UN1 Q+6vBdwKScjxuoTRk3DmSSAOpqTN1q0XB9bmNPucdOjlZhc4tlDTPBElHWiuLxBhRZoG 1jDQ76uhDcfwlY8T3oPgVHZRO4PjZ3E9KILR1LdLKn7cTmsL3XCmTLbZcBGRZ4K8YZZ5 21nctLEY4FmgT638q6FkDG5H2q48WjNdOWzP/kOe+W0P+pI1U2UM0gwl7K25UN/SODUc i3VA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.157.9 with SMTP id n9mr11456840yhk.96.1331523689315; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 20:41:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.146.46.12 with HTTP; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 20:41:29 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 14:41:29 +1100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [AE] Simulating handheld camera From: jarret langmeire To: After Effects Mail List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf303f679482fcaa04bb0384e3 --20cf303f679482fcaa04bb0384e3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi Robert, I'm afraid I don't understand what you mean you by "offset". Also, the layer would then use the parent null as the centre of rotation which would look odd. On 12 March 2012 12:59, Robert Davidson wrote: > Hi J, > Apply the tracked data to a null, then parent your layer to it with an > offset for position. > Cheers, Rob > > On 12/03/2012, at 12:29 PM, jarret langmeire wrote: > > Hi everyone > > I feel a bit silly asking this here but my brain seems to have turned to > mush and I'm having trouble thinking this one through. > > I've tracked a handheld camera shot and now want to apply that tracking > data to the layers in one of my comps, layers which already have animation > data associated with them for position and rotation. What would be the > easiest way to: > > 1. apply the tracked animation data to the layers in the comp > 2. scale the amplitude of the tracked position and rotation data as it > is too severe > > Many thanks for any help. > > J > > > Robert Davidson > Multimedia Specialist > > > > > > -- -- Jarret --20cf303f679482fcaa04bb0384e3 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Robert,=A0I'm afraid I don't understand what you mean you by &qu= ot;offset". Also, the layer would then use the parent null as the cent= re of rotation which would look odd.

On = 12 March 2012 12:59, Robert Davidson <robdav@ozemail.com.au> wrote:
Hi J,Apply the tracked data to a null, then parent your layer to it with an of= fset for position.
Cheers, Rob

On 12/03/20= 12, at 12:29 PM, jarret langmeire wrote:

Hi everyone

I feel a bit silly asking this here but my brain seems = to have turned to mush and I'm having trouble thinking this one through= .

I've tracked a handheld camera shot and now = want to apply that tracking data to the layers in one of my comps, layers w= hich already have animation data associated with them for position and rota= tion. What would be the easiest way to:
  1. apply the tracked animation data to the layers in the comp
  2. scale the amplitude of the tracked position and rotation data as it is= too severe
Many thanks for any help.

J

Robert Davidson
Multimedia Specialist








--
--

Jarret

--20cf303f679482fcaa04bb0384e3--