Return-Path: Received: from mail-ee0-f41.google.com ([74.125.83.41] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 4653470 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 08:30:47 +0100 Received: by eeke53 with SMTP id e53so40705eek.28 for ; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 00:37:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type; bh=k+KUSMyeIzSrDLSsC79wAGXm8e/FS3B1GTw9I+PJZig=; b=XHMXjiduCoH/PB2nOyXRgfxsi7bBRJANviWvkJmIg+gtXYtccdpKstEzkAS44E7rWB xxGNL8FDsASZj02Pah+Yqp63fay3ledkQBwl6hBJOadGScAH0NnpCaGh9CejJsqR65xu 6sjcV7cz+VZLVl2fucgqqR6AJbXwx4ErX0hO8UybhyeJNNTRByTXEGd9bzT7koXep6T+ mWo10zNsfJwLgnw0vJjX/8MGFJYqH9ajDzdJVZInWIgxwIkgX7Yw5ncl+TB77VbiDx5Z 7qIL9u3RZzTMjS5ItgDorlU3T+CmTZd7pkzsv3JFebPYvmW5Y+7gwjI+Rn3rqRkz37Qh cANQ== Received: by 10.14.47.5 with SMTP id s5mr2168288eeb.97.1331624274038; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 00:37:54 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from [192.168.0.52] (p549F056B.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [84.159.5.107]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id r44sm21038775eef.2.2012.03.13.00.37.50 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 13 Mar 2012 00:37:51 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4F5EF94A.2010103@googlemail.com> Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 08:37:46 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Mathias_M=F6hl?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: After Effects Mail List Subject: Re: [AE] Simulating handheld camera References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------010100020208060703010305" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------010100020208060703010305 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi Jarret, what is not very elegant about your expression? If you want to control the smoothness instead of the amplitude, you can also use the smooth expression. If you want a rig with a nice interface, you can also use the smooth iExpression instead (http://bit.ly/xTgoqv) Best Mathias Am 13.03.2012 00:00, schrieb After Effects Mail List: > No, scaling the null wouldn't affect it's position. I'd really need to > apply an expression. Currently I'm simply using an expression whereby I > multiply position by .25 and that works but it's not very elegant and I'd > love to be able to put together a rig that I can use in future. > > On 12 March 2012 16:56, Robert Davidson wrote: > >> > Not sure exactly what you mean. But if you scaled the null down to 25% >> > before you parented the child layer would that work? >> > Rob >> > >> > On 12/03/2012, at 4:45 PM, jarret langmeire wrote: >> > >> > Ah, gotcha. >> > >> > How would I go about scaling the amplitude of the motion so if it moves >> > 200px on the tracked layer, it moves only 50px on the child layer? >> > >> > Ta >> > >> > Jarret -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *mamoworld.com tools & tutorials for After Effects* mathias möhl kapellenweg 36, 79100 freiburg, germany phone +49 (0)761 - 4774 584 info@mamoworld.com --------------010100020208060703010305 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Jarret,

what is not very elegant about your expression?
If you want to control the smoothness instead of the amplitude, you can also use the smooth expression.
If you want a rig with a nice interface, you can also use the smooth iExpression instead (http://bit.ly/xTgoqv)

Best
Mathias

Am 13.03.2012 00:00, schrieb After Effects Mail List:

No, scaling the null wouldn't affect it's position. I'd really need to
apply an expression. Currently I'm simply using an expression whereby I
multiply position by .25 and that works but it's not very elegant and I'd
love to be able to put together a rig that I can use in future.

On 12 March 2012 16:56, Robert Davidson <robdav@ozemail.com.au> wrote:

> Not sure exactly what you mean. But if you scaled the null down to 25%
> before you parented  the child layer would that work?
> Rob
>
> On 12/03/2012, at 4:45 PM, jarret langmeire wrote:
>
> Ah, gotcha.
>
> How would I go about scaling the amplitude of the motion so if it moves
> 200px on the tracked layer, it moves only 50px on the child layer?
>
> Ta
>
> Jarret

mamoworld.com
tools & tutorials for After Effects

mathias möhl
kapellenweg 36, 79100 freiburg, germany
phone +49 (0)761 - 4774 584
info@mamoworld.com

--------------010100020208060703010305--