| ||||||||||
|
Hi Jarret, what is not very elegant about your expression? If you want to control the smoothness instead of the amplitude, you can also use the smooth expression. If you want a rig with a nice interface, you can also use the smooth iExpression instead (http://bit.ly/xTgoqv) Best Mathias Am 13.03.2012 00:00, schrieb After Effects Mail List: No, scaling the null wouldn't affect it's position. I'd really need to apply an expression. Currently I'm simply using an expression whereby I multiply position by .25 and that works but it's not very elegant and I'd love to be able to put together a rig that I can use in future. On 12 March 2012 16:56, Robert Davidson <robdav@ozemail.com.au> wrote:Not sure exactly what you mean. But if you scaled the null down to 25% before you parented the child layer would that work? Rob On 12/03/2012, at 4:45 PM, jarret langmeire wrote: Ah, gotcha. How would I go about scaling the amplitude of the motion so if it moves 200px on the tracked layer, it moves only 50px on the child layer? Ta Jarret --
mamoworld.com tools & tutorials for After Effects
mathias möhl |
