Return-Path: Received: from omr8.networksolutionsemail.com ([205.178.146.58] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 4653479 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 08:38:52 +0100 Received: from cm-omr9 (mail.networksolutionsemail.com [205.178.146.50]) by omr8.networksolutionsemail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q2D7jwPJ021920 for ; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 03:45:58 -0400 Authentication-Results: cm-omr9 smtp.user=torno@sydefxink.com; auth=pass (CRAM-MD5) X-Authenticated-UID: torno@sydefxink.com Received: from [75.51.170.154] ([75.51.170.154:38320] helo=[10.0.1.3]) by cm-omr9 (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.2.41 r(31179/31189)) with ESMTPA id ED/14-22803-53BFE5F4; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 03:45:58 -0400 Subject: Re: [AE] Simulating handheld camera References: From: David Torno Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-A394161B-6921-4FA6-BD52-322C7192A824 X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (9A334) In-Reply-To: Message-Id: <49CAA055-E923-4EC0-9FEA-B3CDA6DAD566@sydefxink.com> Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 00:45:54 -0700 To: After Effects Mail List Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) --Apple-Mail-A394161B-6921-4FA6-BD52-322C7192A824 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 I might be late to offering a solution, but I had made a script that creates= handheld motion awhile back. A whole new version 2 is coming soon, but this= old one is still compatible on CS5 or earlier. http://provideocoalition.com/index.php/motiongraphicsvizfx/story/handheld_ca= mera_script/ David Torno Visual Effects Artist & Supervisor http://www.ghosttownmedia.com O: 213.739.2290 C: 818.391.6060 --------------------- http://www.sydefxink.com http://aeioweyou.blogspot.com http://mactex.blogspot.com "The most useless day is that in which we do not laugh" -Charles Field On Mar 13, 2012, at 12:37 AM, Mathias M=C3=B6hl wro= te: > Hi Jarret, >=20 > what is not very elegant about your expression?=20 > If you want to control the smoothness instead of the amplitude, you can al= so use the smooth expression. > If you want a rig with a nice interface, you can also use the smooth iExpr= ession instead (http://bit.ly/xTgoqv) >=20 > Best > Mathias >=20 > Am 13.03.2012 00:00, schrieb After Effects Mail List: >>=20 >> No, scaling the null wouldn't affect it's position. I'd really need to >> apply an expression. Currently I'm simply using an expression whereby I >> multiply position by .25 and that works but it's not very elegant and I'd= >> love to be able to put together a rig that I can use in future. >>=20 >> On 12 March 2012 16:56, Robert Davidson wrote: >>=20 >>> > Not sure exactly what you mean. But if you scaled the null down to 25%= >>> > before you parented the child layer would that work? >>> > Rob >>> > >>> > On 12/03/2012, at 4:45 PM, jarret langmeire wrote: >>> > >>> > Ah, gotcha. >>> > >>> > How would I go about scaling the amplitude of the motion so if it move= s >>> > 200px on the tracked layer, it moves only 50px on the child layer? >>> > >>> > Ta >>> > >>> > Jarret >=20 >=20 > --=20 > mamoworld.com > tools & tutorials for After Effects > mathias m=C3=B6hl > kapellenweg 36, 79100 freiburg, germany > phone +49 (0)761 - 4774 584 > info@mamoworld.com --Apple-Mail-A394161B-6921-4FA6-BD52-322C7192A824 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
I might be late to offerin= g a solution, but I had made a script that creates handheld motion awhile ba= ck. A whole new version 2 is coming soon, but this old one is still compatib= le on CS5 or earlier.

http= ://provideocoalition.com/index.php/motiongraphicsvizfx/story/handheld_camera= _script/

David Torno
Visual Effects Artist & Supervisor
O: 213.739.2290
C: 818.391.6060
-----= ----------------
http://aeiow= eyou.blogspot.com

"The most useless day is th= at in which we do not laugh"
-Charles Field

On= Mar 13, 2012, at 12:37 AM, Mathias M=C3=B6hl <mamo181@googlemail.com> wrote:

=20 =20 =20 Hi Jarret,

what is not very elegant about your expression?
If you want to control the smoothness instead of the amplitude, you can also use the smooth expression.
If you want a rig with a nice interface, you can also use the smooth iExpression instead (http://bit.ly/xTgoqv)

Best
Mathias

Am 13.03.2012 00:00, schrieb After Effects Mail List: 
No, scaling the null wouldn't affect it's position. I'd=
 really need to
apply an expression. Currently I'm simply using an expression whereby I
multiply position by .25 and that works but it's not very elegant and I'd
love to be able to put together a rig that I can use in future.

On 12 March 2012 16:56, Robert Davidson <robdav@oze=
mail.com.au> wrote:


> Not sure=
 exactly what you mean. But if you scaled the null down to 25%
> before you parented  the child l=
ayer would that work?
> Rob
>
> On 12/03/2012, at 4:45 PM, jarr=
et langmeire wrote:
>
> Ah, gotcha.
>
> How would I go about scaling th=
e amplitude of the motion so if it moves
> 200px on the tracked layer, it m=
oves only 50px on the child layer?
>
> Ta
>
> Jarret


--
mamoworld.com
tools & tutorials for After Effects

mathias m=C3=B6hl
kapellenweg 36, 79100 freiburg, germany
phone +49 (0)761 - 4774 584
info@mamoworld.com

=20
= --Apple-Mail-A394161B-6921-4FA6-BD52-322C7192A824--