Return-Path: Received: from mail-yx0-f169.google.com ([209.85.213.169] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 4653476 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 09:01:37 +0100 Received: by yenm8 with SMTP id m8so264583yen.28 for ; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 01:08:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=f5/mMSqfSEN+7H/c3NdNkuDl+RL5K9DF38fuA3tdPKk=; b=p1fqX5a2z5pkkXGsGPmGUjfWft1mfu5ud+IUCXQPrS3WkfTQe25xckp9SfBqvYgRgJ IkiHdYfjMzFU+Pb4gEbfb1hffQDay8oVlpJ6gfjuNrpCLavSoljJ8+dNNi6Q2yq7Swf8 pkPwMWQNqeKXlQc1mNMo7EmTK0zaTTQlzZ3CFhtsdhoC+U2yX/Hd4lZ4n0ctWLpCtIFv /r9LFse7CYhevvzsTqfBtneGYiyNxwROd1lHvyYEtfDitT0FMS3/7TLT8eMEMqdba5bP Y9bA5Qm4Dxe/CacB1b6nwIoJerNOZZj6rfG7TRoDIBk4vGJPwY8pgUVVZR0ZQEAVSsG3 slLg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.72.167 with SMTP id t27mr16106283yhd.79.1331626122831; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 01:08:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.146.46.12 with HTTP; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 01:08:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 19:08:42 +1100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [AE] Simulating handheld camera From: jarret langmeire To: After Effects Mail List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf3005123006663d04bb1b5e4e --20cf3005123006663d04bb1b5e4e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hiya, Those last two solutions sound great - thanks for that. David, is there somewhere I can sign up for a notification for when that update comes out? Many thanks Jarret On 13 March 2012 18:45, David Torno wrote: > I might be late to offering a solution, but I had made a script that > creates handheld motion awhile back. A whole new version 2 is coming soon= , > but this old one is still compatible on CS5 or earlier. > > > http://provideocoalition.com/index.php/motiongraphicsvizfx/story/handheld= _camera_script/ > > David Torno > Visual Effects Artist & Supervisor > http://www.ghosttownmedia.com > O: 213.739.2290 > C: 818.391.6060 > --------------------- > http://www.sydefxink.com > http://aeioweyou.blogspot.com > http://mactex.blogspot.com > > "The most useless day is that in which we do not laugh" > -Charles Field > > On Mar 13, 2012, at 12:37 AM, Mathias M=F6hl wro= te: > > Hi Jarret, > > what is not very elegant about your expression? > If you want to control the smoothness instead of the amplitude, you can > also use the smooth expression. > If you want a rig with a nice interface, you can also use the smooth > iExpression instead (http://bit.ly/xTgoqv) > > Best > Mathias > > Am 13.03.2012 00:00, schrieb After Effects Mail List: > > No, scaling the null wouldn't affect it's position. I'd really need to > apply an expression. Currently I'm simply using an expression whereby I > multiply position by .25 and that works but it's not very elegant and I'd > love to be able to put together a rig that I can use in future. > > On 12 March 2012 16:56, Robert Davidson wrote: > > > > Not sure exactly what you mean. But if you scaled the null down to 25%= > before you parented the child layer would that work?> Rob>> On 12/03/201= 2, at 4:45 PM, jarret langmeire wrote:>> Ah, gotcha.>> How would I go about= scaling the amplitude of the motion so if it moves> 200px on the tracked l= ayer, it moves only 50px on the child layer?>> Ta>> Jarret > > > > -- > ------------------------------ > * mamoworld.com > tools & tutorials for After Effects* > > mathias m=F6hl > kapellenweg 36, 79100 freiburg, germany > phone +49 (0)761 - 4774 584 > info@mamoworld.com > > --=20 -- Jarret --20cf3005123006663d04bb1b5e4e Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hiya,

Those last two solutions sound great - thanks for = that.

David, is there somewhere I can sign up for = a notification for when that update comes out?

Many thanks

Jarret

On 13 March 2012 18:45, David Torno <torno@sydefxink.com> wrote:
I might be late to offering a solution, but I= had made a script that creates handheld motion awhile back. A whole new ve= rsion 2 is coming soon, but this old one is still compatible on CS5 or earl= ier.

http://prov= ideocoalition.com/index.php/motiongraphicsvizfx/story/handheld_camera_scrip= t/

David Torno
Visual Effects Artist & Supervisor
---------------------
http://www.sydefxink.comhttp://aeiowey= ou.blogspot.com

"The most useless day is tha= t in which we do not laugh"
-Charles Field
<= div class=3D"h5">

On Mar 13, 2012, at 12:37 AM, Mathias M=F6hl <mamo181@googlemail.com> w= rote:

=20 =20 =20 =20 Hi Jarret,

what is not very elegant about your expression?
If you want to control the smoothness instead of the amplitude, you can also use the smooth expression.
If you want a rig with a nice interface, you can also use the smooth iExpression instead (http://bit.ly/xTgoqv)

Best
Mathias

Am 13.03.2012 00:00, schrieb After Effects Mail List: 
No, scaling the null wouldn't affect it's position. I=
9;d really need to
apply an expression. Currently I'm simply using an expression whereby I
multiply position by .25 and that works but it's not very elegant and I=
'd
love to be able to put together a rig that I can use in future.

On 12 March 2012 16:56, Robert Davidson <robdav@ozemail.com.au> wrote:


> Not sure exactly what you mean. But if you s=
caled the null down to 25%
> before you parented  the child layer would that work?
> Rob
>
> On 12/03/2012, at 4:45 PM, jarret langmeire wrote:
>
> Ah, gotcha.
>
> How would I go about scaling the amplitude of the motion =
so if it moves
> 200px on the tracked layer, it moves only 50px on the chi=
ld layer?
>
> Ta
>
> Jarret


--
mamowor= ld.com
tools & tutorials for After Effects

mathias m=F6hl
kapellenweg 36, 79100 freiburg, germany
phone +49 (0)761 - 4774 584
info@mamowo= rld.com

=20



--
--

Jarret

--20cf3005123006663d04bb1b5e4e--