Return-Path: Received: from omr16.networksolutionsemail.com ([205.178.146.66] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 4653494 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 09:05:02 +0100 Received: from cm-omr5 (mail.networksolutionsemail.com [205.178.146.50]) by omr16.networksolutionsemail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q2D8C7HB031155 for ; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 04:12:07 -0400 Authentication-Results: cm-omr5 smtp.user=torno@sydefxink.com; auth=pass (CRAM-MD5) X-Authenticated-UID: torno@sydefxink.com Received: from [75.51.170.154] ([75.51.170.154:38517] helo=[10.0.1.3]) by cm-omr5 (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.2.41 r(31179/31189)) with ESMTPA id BD/3F-23992-7510F5F4; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 04:12:07 -0400 Subject: Re: [AE] Simulating handheld camera References: From: David Torno Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-87814B8C-6ADF-4214-844C-6156F9A5C9FA X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (9A334) In-Reply-To: Message-Id: <74D75DCA-54EA-4C43-A501-B4923B47C608@sydefxink.com> Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 01:12:05 -0700 To: After Effects Mail List Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) --Apple-Mail-87814B8C-6ADF-4214-844C-6156F9A5C9FA Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Consider it done. I'll add you to my beta tester list, so when I get to the p= oint of public testing you'll be in the loop. :) David Torno Visual Effects Artist & Supervisor http://www.ghosttownmedia.com O: 213.739.2290 C: 818.391.6060 --------------------- http://www.sydefxink.com http://aeioweyou.blogspot.com http://mactex.blogspot.com "The most useless day is that in which we do not laugh" -Charles Field On Mar 13, 2012, at 1:08 AM, jarret langmeire wrote: > Hiya, >=20 > Those last two solutions sound great - thanks for that. >=20 > David, is there somewhere I can sign up for a notification for when that u= pdate comes out? >=20 > Many thanks >=20 > Jarret >=20 > On 13 March 2012 18:45, David Torno wrote: > I might be late to offering a solution, but I had made a script that creat= es handheld motion awhile back. A whole new version 2 is coming soon, but th= is old one is still compatible on CS5 or earlier. >=20 > http://provideocoalition.com/index.php/motiongraphicsvizfx/story/handheld_= camera_script/ >=20 > David Torno > Visual Effects Artist & Supervisor > http://www.ghosttownmedia.com > O: 213.739.2290 > C: 818.391.6060 > --------------------- > http://www.sydefxink.com > http://aeioweyou.blogspot.com > http://mactex.blogspot.com >=20 > "The most useless day is that in which we do not laugh" > -Charles Field >=20 > On Mar 13, 2012, at 12:37 AM, Mathias M=C3=B6hl w= rote: >=20 >> Hi Jarret, >>=20 >> what is not very elegant about your expression?=20 >> If you want to control the smoothness instead of the amplitude, you can a= lso use the smooth expression. >> If you want a rig with a nice interface, you can also use the smooth iExp= ression instead (http://bit.ly/xTgoqv) >>=20 >> Best >> Mathias >>=20 >> Am 13.03.2012 00:00, schrieb After Effects Mail List: >>>=20 >>> No, scaling the null wouldn't affect it's position. I'd really need to >>> apply an expression. Currently I'm simply using an expression whereby I >>> multiply position by .25 and that works but it's not very elegant and I'= d >>> love to be able to put together a rig that I can use in future. >>>=20 >>> On 12 March 2012 16:56, Robert Davidson wrote: >>>=20 >>>> > Not sure exactly what you mean. But if you scaled the null down to 25= % >>>> > before you parented the child layer would that work? >>>> > Rob >>>> > >>>> > On 12/03/2012, at 4:45 PM, jarret langmeire wrote: >>>> > >>>> > Ah, gotcha. >>>> > >>>> > How would I go about scaling the amplitude of the motion so if it mov= es >>>> > 200px on the tracked layer, it moves only 50px on the child layer? >>>> > >>>> > Ta >>>> > >>>> > Jarret >>=20 >>=20 >> --=20 >> mamoworld.com >> tools & tutorials for After Effects >> mathias m=C3=B6hl >> kapellenweg 36, 79100 freiburg, germany >> phone +49 (0)761 - 4774 584 >> info@mamoworld.com >>=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > --=20 > -- >=20 > Jarret >=20 --Apple-Mail-87814B8C-6ADF-4214-844C-6156F9A5C9FA Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Consider it done. I'll add= you to my beta tester list, so when I get to the point of public testing yo= u'll be in the loop. :)

David Torno
Visual Effects Artist & S= upervisor
O: 213.739.2290
C: 818.391.6060
---------------------
h= ttp://aeioweyou.blogspot.com

"The most useles= s day is that in which we do not laugh"
-Charles Field
=

On Mar 13, 2012, at 1:08 AM, jarret langmeire <langmeire@gmail.com> wrote:

<= /div>
Hiya,

Those last two s= olutions sound great - thanks for that.

David, is t= here somewhere I can sign up for a notification for when that update comes o= ut?

Many thanks

Jarret

On 13 March 2012 18:45, David Torno <torno@sydefxink.com> wrote:
I might be late to offering a solution, but I h= ad made a script that creates handheld motion awhile back. A whole new versi= on 2 is coming soon, but this old one is still compatible on CS5 or earlier.=


On Mar 13, 2012, at 12:37 AM, Mathias M=C3=B6hl <mamo181@googlemail.com> w= rote:

=20 =20 =20 =20 Hi Jarret,

what is not very elegant about your expression?
If you want to control the smoothness instead of the amplitude, you can also use the smooth expression.
If you want a rig with a nice interface, you can also use the smooth iExpression instead (= http://bit.ly/xTgoqv)

Best
Mathias

Am 13.03.2012 00:00, schrieb After Effects Mail List:
No, scaling the null wouldn't affect it's position. I'd really ne=
ed to
apply an expression. Currently I'm simply using an expression whereby I
multiply position by .25 and that works but it's not very elegant and I'd
love to be able to put together a rig that I can use in future.

On 12 March 2012 16:56, Robert Davidson <robdav@ozemail.com.au> wrote:

> Not sure exactly what you mean. But if you sc=
aled the null down to 25%
> before you parented  the child layer would that work?
> Rob
>
> On 12/03/2012, at 4:45 PM, jarret langmeire wrote:
>
> Ah, gotcha.
>
> How would I go about scaling the amplitude of the motion s=
o if it moves
> 200px on the tracked layer, it moves only 50px on the chil=
d layer?
>
> Ta
>
> Jarret


--

mamoworl= d.com
tools & tutorials for After Effects

mathias m=C3=B6hl
kapellenweg 36, 79100 freiburg, germany
phone +49 (0)761 - 4774 584
info@mamowor= ld.com

=20



--
--

Jarret

= --Apple-Mail-87814B8C-6ADF-4214-844C-6156F9A5C9FA--