|
|
Consider it done. I'll add you to my beta tester list, so when I get to the point of public testing you'll be in the loop. :) David Torno Visual Effects Artist & Supervisor O: 213.739.2290 C: 818.391.6060 --------------------- http://aeioweyou.blogspot.com
"The most useless day is that in which we do not laugh" -Charles Field Hiya,
Those last two solutions sound great - thanks for that.
David, is there somewhere I can sign up for a notification for when that update comes out?
Many thanks
Jarret On 13 March 2012 18:45, David Torno <torno@sydefxink.com> wrote:
I might be late to offering a solution, but I had made a script that creates handheld motion awhile back. A whole new version 2 is coming soon, but this old one is still compatible on CS5 or earlier.
Hi Jarret,
what is not very elegant about your expression?
If you want to control the smoothness instead of the amplitude, you
can also use the smooth expression.
If you want a rig with a nice interface, you can also use the smooth
iExpression instead ( http://bit.ly/xTgoqv)
Best
Mathias
Am 13.03.2012 00:00, schrieb After Effects Mail List:
No, scaling the null wouldn't affect it's position. I'd really need to
apply an expression. Currently I'm simply using an expression whereby I
multiply position by .25 and that works but it's not very elegant and I'd
love to be able to put together a rig that I can use in future.
On 12 March 2012 16:56, Robert Davidson <robdav@ozemail.com.au> wrote:
> Not sure exactly what you mean. But if you scaled the null down to 25%
> before you parented the child layer would that work?
> Rob
>
> On 12/03/2012, at 4:45 PM, jarret langmeire wrote:
>
> Ah, gotcha.
>
> How would I go about scaling the amplitude of the motion so if it moves
> 200px on the tracked layer, it moves only 50px on the child layer?
>
> Ta
>
> Jarret
-- --
Jarret
|
|
