Return-Path: Received: from mail-ob0-f169.google.com ([209.85.214.169] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 4660898 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Mon, 19 Mar 2012 17:41:42 +0100 Received: by obbta14 with SMTP id ta14so1406948obb.28 for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2012 09:41:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=+u4g3hAUYx09QRDRbIG53aSDVB0lbyLdoo+cnYDONo4=; b=F3d4cVNwsSIorCah++ImvEDxAWcbBE44ryPI4uimwrTsxLpHkXelgs1iRZdEL4n/TN 9h7zPjv+CIT+Z3uceH85OMwMhcvEX2kfeIa1kztoZDzL8yexWATt5sA+SQ/wAycTBBf7 fdDwLrjr1Y+3s4CjIpmAqmma/O6RpJpYK1N7w/p9u1C8fWKa+jsB9KG7QLBJCMgd11ah /i1HIrACWWlQA5v21nZQS4COGqhVndCZYWF3cTiWsmv3VojpjX5tvayjM9K7qlGV4VW/ sREgrf9Bdlg0pnCKli3j9rBg4OpcIXzU8hBdxTtBrCHQXUrnv1MaKOkyJrIyQi/RFUSw Bh1A== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.41.6 with SMTP id b6mr14346407obl.10.1332175300518; Mon, 19 Mar 2012 09:41:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.182.74.201 with HTTP; Mon, 19 Mar 2012 09:41:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [207.126.103.130] In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 11:41:40 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [AE] Compound Blur From: Brian Higgins To: After Effects Mail List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d044517a390e21d04bb9b3bbc X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmuH6sUXEUV/3cwSDnZ1Ml/6N6S9IG9oWrJC0C66inEPArJ9AhHsNWa/7VyG97vjmKEX4yl --f46d044517a390e21d04bb9b3bbc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable If you have Sapphire, their S_ZBlur and S_ZDefocus will do the trick. -b On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 11:37 AM, adam mercado wrote: > I just noticed something in the stock Compound Blur effect I don't like. > It does not do the grow bounds trick that Fast Blur does to prevent the > edge of the footage darkening and bleeding to the edge of frame. > > Is there an alternative Compound Blur that works like it should, or a > combination of effects to achieve this with a workaround? > > cheers > > *Adam Mercado* > Influxx Media Production > Fullerton, CA > > Moving Images. For Business > *714=B0928=B09896* > http://www.influxx.com > http://www.twitter.com/influxx > http://www.linkedin.com/in/influxx > http://influxx.tumblr.com/archive > http://www.flickr.com/photos/influxx > > > > > > --=20 brian higgins | senior vfx artist Sol Design 312.706.5500 higgins@soldesignfx.com soldesignfx.com --f46d044517a390e21d04bb9b3bbc Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable If you have Sapphire, their S_ZBlur and S_ZDefocus will do the trick.
-b

On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 11:37 AM, ad= am mercado <adam@i= nfluxx.com> wrote:
I just noticed something in the stock Compound Blur effect I don't like= . It does not do the grow bounds trick that Fast Blur does to prevent the e= dge of the footage darkening and bleeding to the edge of frame.

Is there an alternative Compound Blur that works like it should,= or a combination of effects to achieve this with a workaround?
<= br>
cheers

Adam Mercado
Influxx Media Production
Fullerton,= CA

Moving Images. For Business
714= =B0928=B09896




--=
bri= an higgins | senior vfx artist
Sol =A0Design



--f46d044517a390e21d04bb9b3bbc--