Return-Path: Received: from imr-db03.mx.aol.com ([205.188.91.97] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP id 4668348 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 19:25:18 +0200 Received: from mtaout-ma06.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtaout-ma06.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.41.6]) by imr-db03.mx.aol.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id q2RHPUnG012090 for ; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 13:25:30 -0400 Received: from broom.home (pool-108-23-214-125.lsanca.fios.verizon.net [108.23.214.125]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mtaout-ma06.r1000.mx.aol.com (MUA/Third Party Client Interface) with ESMTPSA id 9A5E3E0000EB; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 13:25:29 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: [AE] OT: old SCSI slide scanners Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 From: Tim Sassoon In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 10:25:28 -0700 Cc: Tim Sassoon Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <561FBCF4-15A8-47AB-90A7-10030C03FEC5@aol.com> References: To: "After Effects Mail List" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257) x-aol-global-disposition: G DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20110426; t=1332869130; bh=+dLplbikfb7mxaOi0dhEcunItqA2YC7WlDtgbr3gmRo=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-Id:Date:Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=kkFk8NJHksM2SuVBJtJ3/madcFV/C9enBtNZBlGWLmnqBXcef9od/zAS4ptaX+IFv vhfVILpiPJkhqBk/iUdRmMOAftqkLyq0WwZuEXcoxKMAsh25xMSax4dXRHxTPgELqX 5BGBBlXPNcLcinafmq9QPY9no3JeBQxQUwibeV6A= X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:470267232:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d29064f71f80935e5 X-AOL-IP: 108.23.214.125 The Plustek scanners are pretty damn cheap. Or get an Epson and have a = flexible multi-use machine. With the SCSI scanners you'll pretty much = have to use VueScan for better or worse. Tim On Mar 27, 2012, at 9:45 AM, Richard Brooker wrote: > Hi. >=20 > I have old SCSI based Polaroid SprintScan 35 and SCI Agfa DuoScan = T-1200 flatbed scanners. Both were quite good back in their day. I need = to scan some slides again, so wondering if what's better and more cost = effective - a SCSI adaptor for my Mac Pro or to buy a new scanner for = 35mm slides? It's not something I'll need and use every day, so I can't = justify paying a lot. >=20 > Any suggestions? Anyone else in this boat with old SCSI gear? >=20 > Thanks and best wishes, >=20 > ~ Richard Brooker > BROOKER DESIGN >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > +---End of message---+ > To unsubscribe send any message to