| ||||||||||
| Reinforcing the point: In my case, they took 24 fps film, slowed it down to 23.976 video, and asked us to cut it against music. Their workflow was to lay the music back in against the film themselves. Unfortunately, the music they provided to us had not been through the same chain as the visuals, so we had to slow down the audio by the same amount to keep things in relative sync. - Chris On Mar 29, 2012, at 10:19 AM, Stephen van Vuuren wrote: >> If I was to add anything to this discussion, it is to be aware of audio > sync if you move between 23.976 and 24 > > Chris is exactly right - I do a lot of DCP (Digital Cinema Package work) and > most people screw this up. They either try to maintain the previous duration > and re-render, causing ugly frame artifacts and taking lots of extra time or > leave as is and audio is out of sync. > > The best results are to leave frames as is and time stretch audio to > conform. > > stephen van vuuren > 336.202.4777 > > http://www.sv2studios.com/ > http://www.outsideinthemovie.com/ > http://www.stephenv2.me/ > > A film is - or should be - more like music than like fiction. It should be a > progression of moods and feelings. The theme, what's behind the emotion, the > meaning, all that comes later. > -Stanley Kubrick > > > > +---End of message---+ > To unsubscribe send any message to <ae-list-off@media-motion.tv> |
