DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
  h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type;
  b=LB3O+riGTabPCHXEkeUk46p4CBxT68uOTfeC8F8FRX3m5G0EPbV48t7+O6OW1a9vpFpRDToU5qm6Z5dW2UpBX87VCJr4CZVo7jPOX0+76wJ1/zfba7BH/YGNyyA0HDKiJDnkzOgu59MOIt8srnMm/SMqHN8NVLLNgZahvTVOJZg=;
References: <list-4649506@media-motion.tv>
Message-ID: <1334097149.50284.YahooMailNeo@web161305.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 15:32:29 -0700 (PDT)
From: Rick <a_pmb_fan@yahoo.com>
Reply-To: Rick <a_pmb_fan@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [AE] PS Touch
To: After Effects Mail List <AE-List@media-motion.tv>
In-Reply-To: <list-4649506@media-motion.tv>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="1854988078-1272287423-1334097149=:50284"

--1854988078-1272287423-1334097149=:50284
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I used PS Touch on Android for a couple of days. It's been out since the mi=
ddle of last year and there already has been a .release and no difference i=
n the file size. It has nothing to do with Apple or the iPad. It's so limit=
ed with that file size that I bailed on it. If they do then I'll try it aga=
in.=0A=A0=0ARick Emery=0Awww.rickemery.com=0A=0A=0A________________________=
________=0A From: Jim Feeley <jfeeley@gmail.com>=0ATo: After Effects Mail L=
ist <AE-List@media-motion.tv> =0ASent: Thursday, March 8, 2012 1:48 PM=0ASu=
bject: Re: [AE] PS Touch=0A =0AMaybe Adobe will issue a dot release that al=
lows higher resolution....and maybe the resolution restriction in the origi=
nal release was to comply in some what with a request from Apple to not tip=
 folks off to (or rather, confirm) the higher resolution of the new iPad.=
=0A=0AConsidering the new iPhoto for iOS can reportedly handle 19-megapixel=
 images, I'd guess (or hope) that Adobe will address at least that issue so=
on.=0A=0ABut I'm just guessing. =0A=0AJim Feeley=0Ajfeeley@gmail.com=0A=0A=
=0A=0AOn Mar 8, 2012, at 10:36 AM, Tim Sassoon wrote:=0A=0A> I'm speechless=
 that Adobe would come out with an iOS app purporting to be a version of Ph=
otoshop that's limited to 1600x1600 pixels; a dimension smaller than what t=
he (new) iPad camera will produce as it's native file. WTF??? So one has to=
 buy another app to REDUCE the size of one's pictures before one can bring =
them into "PS Touch"? And no iPhone version? Someone at the A needs to get =
their head screwed on right; you don't get unlimited chances to make a good=
 impression.=0A> =0A> =0A> Tim Sassoon=0A> SFD=0A> Santa Monica, CA=0A> =0A=
> =0A> =0A=0A=0A+---End of message---+=0ATo unsubscribe send any message to=
 <ae-list-off@media-motion.tv>
--1854988078-1272287423-1334097149=:50284
Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<html><body><div style=3D"color:#000; background-color:#fff; font-family:ar=
ial, helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:10pt"><div><span>I used PS Touch on An=
droid for a couple of days. It's been out since the middle of last year and=
 there already has been a .release and no difference in the file size. It h=
as nothing to do with Apple or the iPad. It's so limited with that file siz=
e that I bailed on it. If they do then I'll try it again.</span></div><div>=
&nbsp;</div><div>Rick Emery<br>www.rickemery.com<br></div>  <div style=3D"f=
ont-size: 10pt; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; "> <div style=3D=
"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'times new roman', 'new york', times, serif;=
 "> <div dir=3D"ltr"> <font size=3D"2" face=3D"Arial"> <hr size=3D"1">  <b>=
<span style=3D"font-weight:bold;">From:</span></b> Jim Feeley &lt;jfeeley@g=
mail.com&gt;<br> <b><span style=3D"font-weight: bold;">To:</span></b> After=
 Effects Mail List &lt;AE-List@media-motion.tv&gt; <br> <b><span style=3D"f=
ont-weight:
 bold;">Sent:</span></b> Thursday, March 8, 2012 1:48 PM<br> <b><span style=
=3D"font-weight: bold;">Subject:</span></b> Re: [AE] PS Touch<br> </font> <=
/div> <br>=0AMaybe Adobe will issue a dot release that allows higher resolu=
tion....and maybe the resolution restriction in the original release was to=
 comply in some what with a request from Apple to not tip folks off to (or =
rather, confirm) the higher resolution of the new iPad.<br><br>Considering =
the new iPhoto for iOS can reportedly handle 19-megapixel images, I'd guess=
 (or hope) that Adobe will address at least that issue soon.<br><br>But I'm=
 just guessing. <br><br>Jim Feeley<br><a ymailto=3D"mailto:jfeeley@gmail.co=
m" href=3D"mailto:jfeeley@gmail.com">jfeeley@gmail.com</a><br><br><br><br>O=
n Mar 8, 2012, at 10:36 AM, Tim Sassoon wrote:<br><br>&gt; I'm speechless t=
hat Adobe would come out with an iOS app purporting to be a version of Phot=
oshop that's limited to 1600x1600 pixels; a dimension smaller than what the=
 (new) iPad camera will produce as it's native file. WTF??? So one has to b=
uy another app to REDUCE the size of one's pictures before one can bring th=
em into
 "PS Touch"? And no iPhone version? Someone at the A needs to get their hea=
d screwed on right; you don't get unlimited chances to make a good impressi=
on.<br>&gt; <br>&gt; <br>&gt; Tim Sassoon<br>&gt; SFD<br>&gt; Santa Monica,=
 CA<br>&gt; <br>&gt; <br>&gt; <br><br><br>+---End of message---+<br>To unsu=
bscribe send any message to &lt;<a ymailto=3D"mailto:ae-list-off@media-moti=
on.tv" href=3D"mailto:ae-list-off@media-motion.tv">ae-list-off@media-motion=
.tv</a>&gt;<br><br><br> </div> </div>  </div></body></html>
--1854988078-1272287423-1334097149=:50284--