| ||||||||||
|
While it is certainly my opinion, I believe it is a well
founded one. I use PCs because price and choice are important to
me, and while anything you can do on one you can do on the
other, I find that OSX is superior in design, implementation,
functionality, and usability. Yet, I use PCs.
I think the comparisons are proper. Most people
are not building home PCs or Hackintoshes. I used to, but I have no time
for it now and if I were going to spend the money that a PC workstation would
cost, I would opt for a Mac instead. But then, all of this is
subjective opinion anyway, is it not?
I really don’t get this fascination with the operating system. How much time are you chaps spending “outside” of the programs you are using to earn money? I have a mixture of systems running Windows 7 & OSX, not because I prefer either of them but because certain software either runs better or doesn’t run at all under a certain OS. Horses for courses. If you really have to compare systems then do it properly: A home-build PC should be compared to a home-build Hackintosh. Here the prices are identical because the hardware is identical. Teddys’ 3930K i7 could just as easily run OSX. A MacPro should be compared to a PC workstation from a “brand name” such as Dell/HP/Boxx etc. Here the Mac is (or was – who knows what the next MP will bring!) cheaper but has fewer video options, less RAM slots etc. Elliot Am 14/04/2012 02:49 schrieb "Glenn Ferguson" unter <ferguson.design@verizon.net>: ... you won't find a better operating system than OSX. |
