Return-Path: Received: from imr-ma06.mx.aol.com ([64.12.78.142] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP id 4694410 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 01:18:29 +0200 Received: from mtaout-da06.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtaout-da06.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.51.134]) by imr-ma06.mx.aol.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id q3NNJXNu026042 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 19:19:33 -0400 Received: from lunette.home (pool-108-23-214-125.lsanca.fios.verizon.net [108.23.214.125]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mtaout-da06.r1000.mx.aol.com (MUA/Third Party Client Interface) with ESMTPSA id 3B1A5E000145; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 19:19:33 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: [AE] OT: RED workflow Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_7FA382B6-BDE3-4322-82E8-888E98951D7C" From: Tim Sassoon In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 16:19:32 -0700 Cc: Tim Sassoon Message-Id: <17E1C784-BE8F-4AC0-A2C1-CC77B805DA38@aol.com> References: To: "After Effects Mail List" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257) x-aol-global-disposition: G DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20110426; t=1335223173; bh=IXfd57uu9tainRoApfGIJdUbiFrqzLMpKenLQCuM2r0=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-Id:Date:Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=i1AGT+UNwh1wK1DEAIGCe8KE+LbVoPjsKhTeJlBtGzC87XG3//ff5qHIYvg/eWx5Y zTVAwOFCb74VbHrIRCQGOfkiTc2yayHNShi7f0kPXYtSlUpEQ6nJHu3JIsA5N7ij4C E5hA53BxnwD8V/CgPEZx/7EtPdmjYZMmzKi3vEHI= X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:451711648:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d33864f95e385221d X-AOL-IP: 108.23.214.125 --Apple-Mail=_7FA382B6-BDE3-4322-82E8-888E98951D7C Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii The Red Rocket apparently produces a lower grade of de-mosaic than = software Best. I still prefer using Redcine (or AE) to make DPX's with a = consistent color temperature, and then go from there using whatever. It = might be a bit of a chickensh*t approach, but you won't get into trouble = at the end. Tim Sassoon SFD Santa Monica, CA On Apr 23, 2012, at 4:04 PM, Phil Spitler wrote: > I'm wondering what tools people are using with Red these days.=20 >=20 > We recently did a project and decided to do all our Red color = correction in our Smoke suite.=20 >=20 > We ended up with a huge bottle neck so now I'm looking into = alternatives that would allow use to use our Mac workstations to color = correct or Red projects. >=20 > Does Resolve on the Mac work well with Red footage? How about FCP / = Color? >=20 > Would it help workflow if we had Red Rocket in some of our boxes? >=20 > Any thoughts? >=20 > Thanks.=20 >=20 > Phil >=20 >=20 > Phil Spitler > www.bonfirelabs.com >=20 >=20 >=20 > +---End of message---+ > To unsubscribe send any message to --Apple-Mail=_7FA382B6-BDE3-4322-82E8-888E98951D7C Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii The Red Rocket apparently produces a lower grade of de-mosaic than software Best. I still prefer using Redcine (or AE) to make DPX's with a consistent color temperature, and then go from there using whatever. It might be a bit of a chickensh*t approach, but you won't get into trouble at the end.


Tim Sassoon
SFD
Santa Monica, CA



On Apr 23, 2012, at 4:04 PM, Phil Spitler wrote:

I'm wondering what tools people are using with Red these days.

We recently did a project and decided to do all our Red color correction in our Smoke suite.

We ended up with a huge bottle neck so now I'm looking into alternatives that would allow use to use our Mac workstations to color correct or Red projects.

Does Resolve on the Mac work well with Red footage? How about FCP / Color?

Would it help workflow if we had Red Rocket in some of our boxes?

Any thoughts?

Thanks.

Phil


Phil Spitler
www.bonfirelabs.com



+---End of message---+
To unsubscribe send any message to <ae-list-off@media-motion.tv>

--Apple-Mail=_7FA382B6-BDE3-4322-82E8-888E98951D7C--