Return-Path: Received: from host6.canaca.com ([66.49.160.142] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 4698543 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 19:18:07 +0200 Received: from 207-195-100-23.regn.static.sasknet.sk.ca ([207.195.100.23] helo=[192.168.1.24]) by host6.canaca.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SNopA-00085I-Ar for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 13:19:18 -0400 Subject: Re: [AE] Rendering Tiff Sequence References: From: Jack Tunnicliffe Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-D3E5A164-B752-4B4D-833D-570A0E3B4451 X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (9B176) In-Reply-To: Message-Id: Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 11:17:33 -0600 To: After Effects Mail List Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - host6.canaca.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - media-motion.tv X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - javapost.ca X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: --Apple-Mail-D3E5A164-B752-4B4D-833D-570A0E3B4451 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Hmmm, sounds like its time to upgrade to CS5.5 or 6. I don't notice any diff= erence in render speeds at 32 bit. Maybe they are slower but it's not enough= to make me notice the difference. Jack Tunnicliffe www.javapost.ca www.caffeineproductions.ca Sent from my Apple iPhone On 2012-04-27, at 10:30 AM, Rick wrote: > When I render in AE CS4 I render out to a TIFF sequence at millions of col= ors and then go into Sony Vegas to mix it and render out an XDCamHD file (or= playout server format). Last night after making change 8 billion to a :30 p= romo, I changed the comp to 32bit and changed the TIFF Color Depth to Trilli= ons. I meant to change it to 16bit, but I didn't notice until this morning t= hat I double punched it. I hit render last night and it said 8.5 hours for t= he render. At 8bit, the render has been taking around 20 minutes using the b= ackground render script and running 8 instances of it. 4 each on 2 HP Z600'= s. >=20 > Anyway, I came in this morning and it had rendered only three frames and t= ook 31 minutes to do so based on the file time stamp. Is 32bit/Trillions not= a good combo? >=20 > Thanks, > =20 > Rick Emery > www.rickemery.com --Apple-Mail-D3E5A164-B752-4B4D-833D-570A0E3B4451 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Hmmm, sounds like its time= to upgrade to CS5.5 or 6. I don't notice any difference in render speeds at= 32 bit. Maybe they are slower but it's not enough to make me notice the dif= ference.

Jack Tunnicliffe

Sent from my Apple iPhone

On 2012-04-27, at 1= 0:30 AM, Rick <a_pmb_fan@yahoo.com= > wrote:

When I render in AE CS4 I render out to a= TIFF sequence at millions of colors and then go into Sony Vegas to mix it a= nd render out an XDCamHD file (or playout server format). Last night after m= aking change 8 billion to a :30 promo, I changed the comp to 32bit and chang= ed the TIFF Color Depth to Trillions. I meant to change it to 16bit, but I d= idn't notice until this morning that I double punched it. I hit render  = ;last night and it said 8.5 hours for the render.  At 8bit, the render h= as been taking around 20 minutes using the background render script and runn= ing 8 instances of it. 4 each on  2 HP Z600's.
<= br>
Anyway, I came in this morning and it had rendere= d only three frames and took 31 minutes to do so based on the file time stam= p. Is 32bit/Trillions not a good combo?

Thanks,
 
= --Apple-Mail-D3E5A164-B752-4B4D-833D-570A0E3B4451--