Return-Path: Received: from oproxy9.bluehost.com ([69.89.24.6] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with SMTP id 4704672 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Thu, 03 May 2012 22:56:47 +0200 Received: (qmail 29343 invoked by uid 0); 3 May 2012 20:58:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO box473.bluehost.com) (74.220.219.73) by oproxy9.bluehost.com with SMTP; 3 May 2012 20:58:11 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=helium14.com; s=default; h=To:References:Message-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Date:In-Reply-To:From:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type; bh=Yq9BMLOoa1jWaIqqgkLkNz7r42APXcK9cU6DEzRCVlI=; b=XsbAzXF+JkyTEVU97fjt+cssDdhZMqjqbEGTfRBp+WTZmSNM0Ike5LJn6+lPTZWQY1aJnQ7yuSdHZsbmxOzqlk6D1eVlYfe/+/e987SoxL1OLxUBiBuF7/5YOfAqvXoS; Received: from 71-92-198-64.static.mtpk.ca.charter.com ([71.92.198.64] helo=[10.0.1.11]) by box473.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1SQ36J-0006Ck-FC for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Thu, 03 May 2012 14:58:11 -0600 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257) Subject: Re: [AE] Thunderbolt and Mac Pro slot speeds From: Eric James Wood In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 3 May 2012 13:58:10 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <368C4DCE-E11A-4BA6-A1D2-254C7459FB41@helium14.com> References: To: "After Effects Mail List" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257) X-Identified-User: {1790:box473.bluehost.com:heliumon:helium14.com} {sentby:smtp auth 71.92.198.64 authed with list@helium14.com} On topic of this message and the original video, are there any = thunderbolt chassis available out there right now anyways? I know some = companies were talking about them, they even wanted close to a grand for = a single slot half length thing. But they were not shipping at all. And does much of this matter with cs6 using the AMD cards in MBP and = iMac's? Just asking, because i would love to be able to have real time again. On 2012.May.03, at 13.51, Chris Meyer wrote: > I had people at NVIDIA telling me I couldn't take advantage of = multiple CUDA cards in a Mac=85until I did it. (To be fair, I had others = at NVIDIA saying you could, in other forums; perhaps a better connection = between engineering, applications, and marketing needs to be made.) >=20 > - Chris >=20 >=20 >=20 > On May 3, 2012, at 2:40 PM, Chris Bobotis wrote: >=20 >> Wouldn't it be great if NVIDIA or someone who is very GPU savvy at = Adobe could chime in. Just saying. >>=20 >> Cheers, >> Chris >> Mettle.com >> Skype: Mettlecom >>=20 >>=20 >> On 2012-05-03, at 4:36 PM, Dave Bittner wrote: >>=20 >>> I'm fairly sure that Rob picked that up from me. :)=20 >>>=20 >>> So, to be fair, it's not exactly independent confirmation. >>>=20 >>>=20 >>> On May 3, 2012, at 3:25PM, Chris Meyer wrote: >>>=20 >>>> Diving through this thread seems to confirm the info Rob Birnholz = picked up at NAB that the GTX cards are optimized for writing to screen = and hobbled at writing data back to the CPU, compared to the Quadro = cards which are more generalized graphics processors than "just" display = cards. >>>>=20 >>>> - Chris >>>=20 >>>=20 >>> +---End of message---+ >>> To unsubscribe send any message to >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> +---End of message---+ >> To unsubscribe send any message to >=20 >=20 > +---End of message---+ > To unsubscribe send any message to --=20 Helium14 | www.helium14.com Design | Motion + Graphic www.helium14.com 'the next best thing to knowing something, is knowing where to find it'