Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Subject: Re: [AE] sub-comp scaling issue
From: James Culbertson <albion@speakeasy.net>
In-Reply-To: <list-4707413@media-motion.tv>
Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 11:00:33 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <A6C925AB-C326-44B5-8B38-EFF08C11381A@speakeasy.net>
References: <list-4707413@media-motion.tv>
To: "After Effects Mail List" <AE-List@media-motion.tv>

Totally agreed. But as noted in my original post, I am using the =
blending effect extensively to transition elements and CT screws things =
up in this particular case.

In this case, a script saved my bacon!

James


On May 7, 2012, at 9:07 AM, Chris Meyer wrote:

> This is a case where Collapse Transformations can save your bacon. =
Although you have to be wary, as sometimes it introduces problems of it =
its own (such as a stencil or blending mode in a precomp now affecting =
later comps).
>=20
> - Chris
>=20
>=20
> On May 6, 2012, at 5:53 PM, James Culbertson wrote:
>=20
>> A client has changed the final deliverable scaling which increases =
the size of the comp (delivery is for Kindle portrait mode). I can use =
the scale composition script but this does not scale content within =
sub-comps appropriately. Many of my layers use the blend transition so I =
cannot enable collapse transformations.
>>=20
>> The source images involved are all more than large enough. Is there a =
script or other process that will allow me to automatically exchange too =
small scaling in the sub-comp for too large scaling in the main comp =
such that overall scale and position of a layer stay the same?
>>=20
>> I hope not to have to fix this all by hand...
>>=20
>> Thanks,
>>=20
>> James
>>=20
>>=20
>> +---End of message---+
>> To unsubscribe send any message to <ae-list-off@media-motion.tv>
>=20
>=20
> +---End of message---+
> To unsubscribe send any message to <ae-list-off@media-motion.tv>
>=20