Return-Path: Received: from mout.perfora.net ([74.208.4.195] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP id 4710062 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Wed, 09 May 2012 16:05:45 +0200 Received: from mbp-17.westell.com (50-55-2-120.waus.wi.frontiernet.net [50.55.2.120]) by mrelay.perfora.net (node=mrus3) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0Likh3-1RsEV11cb7-00ce9w; Wed, 09 May 2012 10:07:19 -0400 From: Steve Oakley Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_70AE7282-85D5-47A8-ACF6-6D607C20AD5F" Subject: Re: [AE] made in CS6 Date: Wed, 9 May 2012 09:07:16 -0500 In-Reply-To: To: "After Effects Mail List" References: Message-Id: <796703BE-8FB7-4392-A368-93EFDFB11EAB@practicali.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257) X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:KCKtr+OKqkkJWcUDvLNvKwrZApUJYCmURxrm5JUHEPd Yq6qGYHzKGbckIMrq0/yl4lAxAphD0Y9bCVgIJMQjuAw2xgwv+ o/H6OAKbNGBLFEbMhfIGSd3XiGiHKpAJpry19lB/fUMV4DOtXE FCipszvfIUUx1uj9PCiAUQFzNaXPZp9zhrVffVvAq/Tm9GiW9+ IB8EXCYa1QlXz8QatILXePGy5vuNiNWbKXT0mJsp4hVoFyhy8H tjZdaZnRM3P3dU7ZbUgFDCLK1BvnOV6HVL+L3kKtTopC/S+2ss 39XgIV+6Pxg6J92pjjAfftIFtC/KyiSLWA1BqBxl5/BJbomJb5 MOMxI3s2PbYm7ExgJnpPQ/Vrjo7tAXxWDVZCcyfOj+5YfAu1+8 6WW3IZwQz06gQ== --Apple-Mail=_70AE7282-85D5-47A8-ACF6-6D607C20AD5F Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 I don't have or use C4D so I couldn't render anything 3D that way. AE is = my app of choice, its what I have in front of me to use. please keep in = mind this is all new for AE - ray tracing and the start of real 3D. its = an entirely new look / capabilities. for how long have people asked for = real 3D in AE ? forever. I don't think knocking is right. 16 photons was about right. I had done some lower passes and it was too = grainy. not saying that wasn't a good look...I'll go check the project = again. I've seen some other really nice work done which will hopefully = surface soon. S On May 9, 2012, at 8:37 AM, James WIlson wrote: > I think 16 photons might be overkill considering the dark nature and = minimal amount of objects to bounce light off of. Maybe it could have = been rendered in less time with the same results if you took that = setting down. It does look nice. >=20 >=20 > On May 9, 2012, at 2:47 AM, mylenium@mylenium.de wrote: >=20 >> Yeah, and the same stuff probably renders in the same time in C4D - = without any GPU fancies required and on a 3 year old machine. Ridiculous = and nothing to write home about. >> =20 >> Mylenium=20 >> [Pour Myl=E8ne, ange sur terre]=20 >> -----------------------------------------=20 >> www.mylenium.de=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> Steve Oakley hat am 9. Mai 2012 um 07:27 = geschrieben:=20 >>=20 >> > ok... now that AE CS6 is loose I'll show you some titles I made = for my web shows. CS6 rendered with Q4000 + Tesla C2075 in 40 min as I = recall... thats with cranked up DoF, motion blur, 16 photons / pixel - = ie real nice settings :) its quick, don't blink. totally done in AE=20 >> >=20 >> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DX-ZNVyGSVIY&feature=3Dyoutu.be=20 >> >=20 --Apple-Mail=_70AE7282-85D5-47A8-ACF6-6D607C20AD5F Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 I = don't have or use C4D so I couldn't render anything 3D that way. AE is = my app of choice, its what I have in front of me to use. please = keep in mind this is all new for AE - ray tracing and the start of real = 3D. its an entirely new look / capabilities. for how long have = people asked for real 3D in AE ? forever. I don't think knocking is = right.

16 photons was about right. I had done some = lower passes and it was too grainy. not saying that wasn't a good = look...I'll go check the project = again.

I've seen some other really nice = work done which will hopefully surface = soon.

S

On May 9, 2012, = at 8:37 AM, James WIlson wrote:

I think 16 photons might be = overkill considering the dark nature and minimal amount of objects to = bounce light off of. Maybe it could have been rendered in less time with = the same results if you took that setting down. It does look = nice.

On May 9, 2012, at 2:47 AM, mylenium@mylenium.de = wrote:

=20 =20
Yeah, and the same stuff probably renders in the same time in C4D - = without any GPU fancies required and on a 3 year old machine. Ridiculous = and nothing to write home about.

Mylenium
[Pour Myl=E8ne, ange sur terre]
-----------------------------------------
www.mylenium.de

Steve Oakley <steveo@practicali.com> hat = am 9. Mai 2012 um 07:27 geschrieben:

> ok... now that AE CS6 is loose I'll show you some titles I = made for my web shows. CS6 rendered with Q4000 + Tesla C2075 in 40 min = as I recall... thats with cranked up DoF, motion blur, 16 photons / = pixel - ie real nice settings :) its quick, don't blink. totally done in = AE
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DX-ZNVyGSVIY&feature=3Dyoutu.be=
= >

= --Apple-Mail=_70AE7282-85D5-47A8-ACF6-6D607C20AD5F--