Return-Path: Received: from mail-ee0-f41.google.com ([74.125.83.41] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 4710676 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Thu, 10 May 2012 00:19:47 +0200 Received: by eekb47 with SMTP id b47so285908eek.28 for ; Wed, 09 May 2012 15:21:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:from:mime-version:content-type:subject:date:in-reply-to:to :references:message-id:x-mailer; bh=do5EXio3p5/skO8v8OlCDywTLwvwkNbaPQ0uSZGSHr8=; b=RNUxBladQi/DvBK9ce1iwYxmksY+lIkH5W0OBRRT5eXcJLJzd2GPwu9uCFKyCz15ha Ur0RGh4u5Utpg+dz52qFkFp5li6FgOrPOSvxXo3+UTu1w3VGU/NG5MJotCoSThzlkIB2 myCRwnGaH4IJobXOI7fQtnOOfZejh+hzU8ZRkOrPB7ftmsrH0FRgUOcSNlud54B65vYv iu0gSEA2N2tIGfk/7693/cnLiLrjLDsZU8uk1rZmt3zaiiZMEgRu41mJ8ekyU9f5UwxD 1evE/GkqG2InlsvpCJ/g55SA1xZCRx4V9jUCr2EKTS4UJgu/Mvf1hCCeUuddQqgvZn4H mTWQ== Received: by 10.213.33.193 with SMTP id i1mr961960ebd.45.1336602083699; Wed, 09 May 2012 15:21:23 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from [192.168.1.101] (dhcp-077-249-019-212.chello.nl. [77.249.19.212]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f16sm19221523eec.2.2012.05.09.15.21.22 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 09 May 2012 15:21:22 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Gary Berendsen From: Gary Berendsen Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_F2F26181-199A-4A8A-83D7-73A449647575" Subject: Re: [AE] 2 gfx cards in a workstation and cuda acceleration Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 00:21:21 +0200 In-Reply-To: To: "After Effects Mail List" References: Message-Id: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257) --Apple-Mail=_F2F26181-199A-4A8A-83D7-73A449647575 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii So in plain speak: I will keep the accuracy of the quadro. if attached to a monitor. And the cheaper gfx cards become horsepower while the quadro controls = the quality? Gary Berendsen - VFX Generalist @DuintjerCS Kamer 1.009 Vijzelstraat 72 1017 HL Amsterdam gary@garyberendsen.com mob:+31 6 1438 5398 http://garyberendsen.com On May 10, 2012, at 12:00 AM, Todd Kopriva wrote: > Headless or not makes no difference for CUDA computation. It does = matter for OpenGL usage, which requires a connected monitor. >=20 >> -----Original Message----- >> From: After Effects Mail List [mailto:AE-List@media-motion.tv] On >> Behalf Of Robert Behnke >> Sent: 09May2012 14:57 >> To: After Effects Mail List >> Subject: Re: [AE] 2 gfx cards in a workstation and cuda acceleration >>=20 >> What if you run the quadro 4000 headless? And then use the ATI 5770 = to >> drive 2 monitors? Same deal? >>=20 >> Robert Behnke >>=20 >> ________________________________ >>=20 >> From: Brian Maffitt >> To: After Effects Mail List >> Sent: Wednesday, May 9, 2012 2:52 PM >> Subject: Re: [AE] 2 gfx cards in a workstation and cuda acceleration >>=20 >>=20 >> After Effects will use all available cores on all cards. The RAM, per >> card, will be equal to the smallest of the two cards (so if one has >> 1GB, and one has 2GB, both cards will use 1GB). >>=20 >> Premiere behaves differently but someone else will have to chime in >> with the details. >>=20 >> B >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> How do the adobe apps choose what to use? >> I have a quadro 4000 attached to monitor 1 >> and also a gtx 570 attached to monitor 2 >> How does the adobe app choose which is the card to use? >> I looked but it is not clear. >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> Gary Berendsen - VFX Generalist >> @DuintjerCS Kamer 1.009 >> Vijzelstraat 72 >> 1017 HL Amsterdam >> gary@garyberendsen.com >>=20 >> mob:+31 6 1438 5398 >> http://garyberendsen.com/ >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >=20 >=20 > +---End of message---+ > To unsubscribe send any message to --Apple-Mail=_F2F26181-199A-4A8A-83D7-73A449647575 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii So in = plain speak:
I will keep the accuracy of the quadro.
if = attached to a monitor.
And the cheaper gfx cards become = horsepower while the quadro controls the = quality?


Gary = Berendsen - VFX Generalist
  @DuintjerCS = Kamer 1.009
  Vijzelstraat = 72
  1017 HL Amsterdam
  mob:+31 6 1438 = 5398





On May 10, 2012, at 12:00 AM, Todd Kopriva wrote:

Headless or not makes no difference for CUDA = computation. It does matter for OpenGL usage, which requires a connected = monitor.

-----Original = Message-----
From: After = Effects Mail List [mailto:AE-List@media-motion.tv] = On
Behalf Of Robert = Behnke
Sent: 09May2012 = 14:57
To: After Effects Mail = List
Subject: Re: [AE] 2 gfx = cards in a workstation and cuda acceleration

What if you run = the quadro 4000 headless? And then use the ATI 5770 = to
drive 2 monitors? Same = deal?

Robert = Behnke

________________________________

From: Brian = Maffitt <brian@totaltraining.com>
To: After Effects Mail List = <AE-List@media-motion.tv>
Sent: Wednesday, May 9, 2012 = 2:52 PM
Subject: Re: [AE] 2 = gfx cards in a workstation and cuda = acceleration


After Effects = will use all available cores on all cards. The RAM, = per
card, will be equal to the = smallest of the two cards (so if one has
1GB, and one has 2GB, both cards will use = 1GB).

Premiere = behaves differently but someone else will have to chime = in
with the = details.

B



How do = the adobe apps choose what to use?
= I have a quadro 4000 attached to monitor = 1
and also a gtx 570 attached to = monitor 2
How does = the adobe app choose which is the card to = use?
I looked = but it is not clear.



Gary = Berendsen - VFX Generalist
=  @DuintjerCS Kamer 1.009
=  Vijzelstraat 72
=  1017 HL Amsterdam
= gary@garyberendsen.com

=  mob:+31 6 1438 5398
=  http://garyberendsen.com/










+---End of message---+
To = unsubscribe send any message to <ae-list-off@media-motion.tv>

= --Apple-Mail=_F2F26181-199A-4A8A-83D7-73A449647575--