Return-Path: Received: from host6.canaca.com ([66.49.160.142] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 4711932 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Fri, 11 May 2012 08:06:21 +0200 Received: from [74.198.150.235] (helo=[25.68.146.235]) by host6.canaca.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SSj1B-0004Yl-5T for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Fri, 11 May 2012 02:07:57 -0400 Subject: Re: [AE] made in CS6 References: From: Jack Tunnicliffe Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-EB36F9D6-5D11-4B6A-B338-080B5EEA6349 X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (9B206) In-Reply-To: Message-Id: <9D215349-B5E4-4DAE-A5C9-957498EA3C74@javapost.ca> Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 00:05:46 -0600 To: After Effects Mail List Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - host6.canaca.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - media-motion.tv X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - javapost.ca X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: --Apple-Mail-EB36F9D6-5D11-4B6A-B338-080B5EEA6349 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii I assume you're kidding about Davinci costing so much. A $250,000 Unix color= grading system two years ago now $999.00 on the Mac with a Cuda card. Jack Tunnicliffe www.javapost.ca www.caffeineproductions.ca Sent from my Apple iPhone On 2012-05-10, at 11:21 PM, Enrique Gamez wrote:= > Yeah, and DaVinci costs an arm and a thigh! >=20 > From: Jack Tunnicliffe > Reply-To: After Effects Mail List > Date: Wednesday, May 9, 2012 9:49 AM > To: After Effects Mail List > Subject: Re: [AE] made in CS6 >=20 > I would say that many of the filters that do need to be optimized are for G= PU. These are mostly third party but the reason I use GenArts Sapphire and M= onster and Red Giant filters like Colorista for a lot of my work, because th= ey are GPU accelerated. If you're using an AE filter, levels, ramp, a channe= l filter, etc, I don't know that GPU would make too much difference. Maybe s= ome of the stylize or generate filters where calculations get more complicat= ed would get some help. >=20 > It would be good if all third party filter manufacturers moved toward GPU a= cceleration. This is what blows my mind every time I used Davinci Resolve. I= t all runs on the GPU and everything is real time, playback, adding many nod= es for correction and even rendering. It leaves most applications in the dus= t. >=20 > Jack Tunnicliffe > Java Post Production > www.javapost.ca >=20 >=20 >=20 > On May 9, 2012, at 10:39 AM, Robert Houghton wrote: >=20 > What would really knock my socks off would be to optimize as many of the f= ilters as they can in After Effects to utilize both CPU and GPU. Even if tha= t was a .1 upgrade I would gladly pay for that. > Really what is driving me to buy CS6 is the caching and the tracking a= lthough the potential to use the 3D in there like Brian did in his nice vide= o is very interesting. > -Rob > ------------------- > Robert Houghton > Houghton Media > Motion Graphics, Compositing, Animation > www.houghtonmedia.com > +---End of message---+ > To unsubscribe send any message to >=20 >=20 > +---End of message---+ > To unsubscribe send any message to >=20 --Apple-Mail-EB36F9D6-5D11-4B6A-B338-080B5EEA6349 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
I assume you're kidding ab= out Davinci costing so much. A $250,000 Unix color grading system two years a= go now $999.00 on the Mac with a Cuda card.

Jack Tunnicliffe
www.caffeineproductions.ca

Sent from my Apple iPhon= e

On 2012-05-10, at 11:21 PM, Enrique Gamez <enrique0210@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
<= br>
Yeah, and DaVinci co= sts an arm and a thigh!

From: Jack Tunnicliffe <jack= @javapost.ca>
Reply-To: A= fter Effects Mail List <AE-Lis= t@media-motion.tv>
Date: W= ednesday, May 9, 2012 9:49 AM
To: After Effects Mail List <AE-= List@media-motion.tv>
Subject: Re: [AE] made in CS6

I would sa= y that many of the filters that do need to be optimized are for GPU. These a= re mostly third party but the reason I use GenArts Sapphire and Monster and R= ed Giant filters like Colorista for a lot of my work, because they are GPU a= ccelerated. If you're using an AE filter, levels, ramp, a channel filter, et= c, I don't know that GPU would make too much difference. Maybe some of the s= tylize or generate filters where calculations get more complicated would get= some help.

It would be good if all third party fi= lter manufacturers moved toward GPU acceleration. This is what blows my mind= every time I used Davinci Resolve. It all runs on the GPU and everything is= real time, playback, adding many nodes for correction and even rendering. I= t leaves most applications in the dust.

Jack Tunni= cliffe
Java Post Production



On May 9, 2012, at 10:39 AM, Robert Houghton wrote:

What would really= knock my socks off would be to optimize as many of the filters as they can i= n After Effects to utilize both CPU and GPU. Even if that was a .1 upgrade I= would gladly pay for that.
    Re= ally what is driving me to buy CS6 is the caching and the tracking although t= he potential to use the 3D in there like Brian did in his nice video is very= interesting.
    -Rob
<= /div>
-------------------
Robert Houghton
Houghto= n Media
Motion Graphics, Compositing, Animation
+---End of message---+
To unsubsc= ribe send any message to <= ae-list-off@media-motion.tv>

+---End of message---+
To unsubscribe send any messag= e to <ae-list-off@media-mo= tion.tv>

= --Apple-Mail-EB36F9D6-5D11-4B6A-B338-080B5EEA6349--