Return-Path: Received: from asbnvacz-mailrelay01.megapath.net ([207.145.128.243] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP id 4712348 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Fri, 11 May 2012 17:05:38 +0200 Received: from mail6.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail6.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.50]) by asbnvacz-mailrelay01.megapath.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EED0A704CF for ; Fri, 11 May 2012 11:07:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: (qmail 10285 invoked from network); 11 May 2012 15:07:17 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.4.0 ppid: 11387, pid: 5561, t: 3.5468s scanners: clamav: 0.88.2/m:52/d:10739 spam: 3.0.4 Received: from c-67-185-28-214.hsd1.wa.comcast.net (HELO [192.168.1.125]) (albion@[67.185.28.214]) (envelope-sender ) by mail6.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 11 May 2012 15:07:13 -0000 From: James Culbertson Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-1--188136190 Subject: Re: [AE] made in CS6 Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 08:07:12 -0700 In-Reply-To: To: "After Effects Mail List" References: Message-Id: <5452799A-4D0C-4F37-9EB0-FDA9A0B7B8D5@speakeasy.net> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.4 (2005-06-05) on mail6.sea5 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=8.0 tests=HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=disabled version=3.0.4 --Apple-Mail-1--188136190 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii OK, how about a toenail? James On May 10, 2012, at 11:27 PM, Jack Tunnicliffe wrote: > Well the Davinci free version is fully featured HD. we picked up Cuda = cards on eBay for about $500 per system. >=20 > Jack Tunnicliffe > Java Post Production >=20 > On May 11, 2012, at 12:12 AM, James Culbertson = wrote: >=20 >> I think he meant it costs a pinky and a big toe. >>=20 >> James >>=20 >>=20 >> On May 10, 2012, at 11:05 PM, Jack Tunnicliffe wrote: >>=20 >>> I assume you're kidding about Davinci costing so much. A $250,000 = Unix color grading system two years ago now $999.00 on the Mac with a = Cuda card. >>>=20 >>> Jack Tunnicliffe >>> www.javapost.ca >>> www.caffeineproductions.ca >>>=20 >>> Sent from my Apple iPhone >>>=20 >>> On 2012-05-10, at 11:21 PM, Enrique Gamez = wrote: >>>=20 >>>> Yeah, and DaVinci costs an arm and a thigh! >>>>=20 >>>> From: Jack Tunnicliffe >>>> Reply-To: After Effects Mail List >>>> Date: Wednesday, May 9, 2012 9:49 AM >>>> To: After Effects Mail List >>>> Subject: Re: [AE] made in CS6 >>>>=20 >>>> I would say that many of the filters that do need to be optimized = are for GPU. These are mostly third party but the reason I use GenArts = Sapphire and Monster and Red Giant filters like Colorista for a lot of = my work, because they are GPU accelerated. If you're using an AE filter, = levels, ramp, a channel filter, etc, I don't know that GPU would make = too much difference. Maybe some of the stylize or generate filters where = calculations get more complicated would get some help. >>>>=20 >>>> It would be good if all third party filter manufacturers moved = toward GPU acceleration. This is what blows my mind every time I used = Davinci Resolve. It all runs on the GPU and everything is real time, = playback, adding many nodes for correction and even rendering. It leaves = most applications in the dust. >>>>=20 >>>> Jack Tunnicliffe >>>> Java Post Production >>>> www.javapost.ca >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>> On May 9, 2012, at 10:39 AM, Robert Houghton wrote: >>>>=20 >>>> What would really knock my socks off would be to optimize as many = of the filters as they can in After Effects to utilize both CPU and GPU. = Even if that was a .1 upgrade I would gladly pay for that. >>>> Really what is driving me to buy CS6 is the caching and the = tracking although the potential to use the 3D in there like Brian did in = his nice video is very interesting. >>>> -Rob >>>> ------------------- >>>> Robert Houghton >>>> Houghton Media >>>> Motion Graphics, Compositing, Animation >>>> www.houghtonmedia.com >>>> +---End of message---+ >>>> To unsubscribe send any message to >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>> +---End of message---+ >>>> To unsubscribe send any message to >>>>=20 >>=20 --Apple-Mail-1--188136190 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Well the Davinci free version is fully featured = HD. we picked up Cuda cards on eBay for about $500 per = system.

Jack Tunnicliffe
Java Post = Production

On May 11, 2012, at 12:12 AM, James = Culbertson <albion@speakeasy.net> = wrote:

I = think he meant it costs a pinky and a big = toe.

James


On = May 10, 2012, at 11:05 PM, Jack Tunnicliffe wrote:

I assume you're kidding about Davinci costing = so much. A $250,000 Unix color grading system two years ago now $999.00 = on the Mac with a Cuda card.

Jack Tunnicliffe

Sent from my = Apple iPhone

On 2012-05-10, at 11:21 PM, Enrique Gamez = <enrique0210@sbcglobal.net>= ; wrote:

Yeah,= and DaVinci costs an arm and a thigh!

From: = Jack Tunnicliffe <jack@javapost.ca>
Reply-To: After Effects Mail List = <AE-List@media-motion.tv>Date: Wednesday, May 9, 2012 = 9:49 AM
To: After Effects = Mail List <AE-List@media-motion.tv>Subject: Re: [AE] made in = CS6

I would say that many of the = filters that do need to be optimized are for GPU. These are mostly third = party but the reason I use GenArts Sapphire and Monster and Red Giant = filters like Colorista for a lot of my work, because they are GPU = accelerated. If you're using an AE filter, levels, ramp, a channel = filter, etc, I don't know that GPU would make too much difference. Maybe = some of the stylize or generate filters where calculations get more = complicated would get some help.

It would be = good if all third party filter manufacturers moved toward GPU = acceleration. This is what blows my mind every time I used Davinci = Resolve. It all runs on the GPU and everything is real time, playback, = adding many nodes for correction and even rendering. It leaves most = applications in the dust.

Jack = Tunnicliffe
Java Post Production

<= div>

On May 9, 2012, at 10:39 AM, Robert = Houghton wrote:

What would really knock = my socks off would be to optimize as many of the filters as they can in = After Effects to utilize both CPU and GPU. Even if that was a .1 upgrade = I would gladly pay for that.
=
    Really what is driving me to buy CS6 = is the caching and the tracking although the potential to use the 3D in = there like Brian did in his nice video is very interesting.
=
    -Rob
= -------------------
Robert Houghton
Houghton = Media
Motion Graphics, Compositing, Animation
+---End of message---+
= To unsubscribe send any message to <ae-list-off@media-motion.tv>



=

<= /blockquote>
= --Apple-Mail-1--188136190--