Return-Path: Received: from mail-gg0-f169.google.com ([209.85.161.169] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 4717711 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Thu, 17 May 2012 20:20:56 +0200 Received: by ggm4 with SMTP id 4so2194434ggm.28 for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 11:22:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer :x-gm-message-state; bh=r6iRjP5NX40s1pmG4vOspLUFFUGW6jjui2ZV4/HL6ZM=; b=HNr96eV+Ll3PcVO25KzmxVGSZOWjWwt1w8aOiSOwEx1OgnHeS3IWpWkfs+vsvPtHtC pmQTsIoe7rY12RjChlcs6G35yomcPG9v+5rD9aC6Q14Z1SHvoWdpxEoSYDh1wCj/jrm7 1HZZ7Xla9yvEKIelU4TdnbUqL99pymXcbEy0SvJDhYiIMkOs/nBujMwUm7Q6ZmDPQhch dwh7d9hlzwjMhZpXGyb+9l29uNKl7XT54TN3AjTNMU/qtVPbvJPOCFCCh+SSZKxFpUQp Qh1cpqxF2WDv8asTeEIz58DuqBx3/VUEJgF05n8sRSrtdfJDgZs2jBARUDfAEJISJCT/ tYKA== Received: by 10.43.49.201 with SMTP id vb9mr5543714icb.35.1337278966050; Thu, 17 May 2012 11:22:46 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from [192.168.1.227] (c-71-63-186-29.hsd1.mn.comcast.net. [71.63.186.29]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b11sm8147634igq.7.2012.05.17.11.22.45 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 17 May 2012 11:22:45 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257) Subject: Re: [AE] Clear disk cache based on a project ? From: Carey Dissmore In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 13:22:43 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <743B1C54-D471-4FFB-A83C-12C8B7FB5E7E@imugonline.com> References: To: "After Effects Mail List" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257) X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmcDVMwGfFAS/XSjKu40wJbPXu0rErpLR87Ms+wn2XGtwN3xtbstyr0f0BNBI79gqURF2/H I'm starting to spec out a new machine and an SSD for the cache is = definitely in order. It'll be 6G SATA-connected at minimum, but I'm = actually considering perhaps RAID-0 stripe of two 6G SSD's to improve = performance and reduce latency all-the-more. Anyone have any thoughts on = how much of a difference that would make in AE? Worth doing? Assume = fully modern mobo/chipset machine. carey On May 17, 2012, at 1:13 PM, Rendernyc wrote: > You can set your disk cache to a folder for each project but would = have to change this manually when u switch projects in the prefs.=20 >=20 > The cache will clear itself out when it starts getting full based on = age >=20 > Just remember the cache files aren't project dependent. If you have a = comp that is cached in multiple aep's it uses the single cached frames = for all.=20 >=20 > On May 17, 2012, at 2:03 PM, Michael Malone wrote: >=20 >> The new persistent disk cache is super awesome and will only get = better when I get a dedicated SSD. One thing that would make it even = better is the ability to clear the cache based on a particular project. = I'm always juggling several projects at once and when I finish one I = would like to clear the cache of that project. >>=20 >> Although, I guess it isn't that important as the old stuff will get = flushed as new stuff happens. Still might be handy. I wonder if that = kind of thing is scriptable? >>=20 >> mike >>=20 >> +---End of message---+ >> To unsubscribe send any message to >=20 > +---End of message---+ > To unsubscribe send any message to