Return-Path: Received: from mail-vb0-f41.google.com ([209.85.212.41] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 4724599 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Fri, 25 May 2012 19:05:55 +0200 Received: by vbbey12 with SMTP id ey12so862496vbb.28 for ; Fri, 25 May 2012 10:08:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=MaC9TthWDmrvUt5s0Vh49La+nuXlO8Zkzl1OIFYjJFk=; b=gOX9YX4rmnyjN/WLCNyuFrwZ5D8Uzc+0jb+/4HANsxIPDjFf9jAbW0Cu7JPN3OuLs2 d6YGdL+XGnbOYdW7BKGsBar4X6TUcu+g7mlwB4Hw9i39G1UbtsfNUTtFdBxr6xNj15kX haKMqKeYiB9TqY5/bnpWxAx9QQ8lJk1MF4xD7+ZwPMKVJrXWpSVlDuveZIKwaSzxVp5A sdxJ7AcVmAW4+DAEyz6ey7edjNR0ba/XK5OWLe3SRbJQtV/v96bPY0MhmbQxcVTGsyeR pcozqvnfT768lb9FmtpfDXVEw4IItg4Xs8EJ4bZzleHugQDF6Dkwwij47Qq00VNxcqs5 Me0Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.221.1.82 with SMTP id np18mr114564vcb.22.1337965680304; Fri, 25 May 2012 10:08:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.149.70 with HTTP; Fri, 25 May 2012 10:08:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 13:08:00 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [AE] Best GFX card for AE/PP From: rendernyc To: After Effects Mail List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec54eeab618a14104c0df69e4 --bcaec54eeab618a14104c0df69e4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 yah, id like to see some tests... i believe its the "NVIDIA has dropped the shader clock with Kepler, opting instead to double the number of CUDA cores to achieve the same effect, " I keep hearing how the 680 cuda performance is nowhere more similar to the 580 then the 3x cuda cores would suggest but havent seen an AE tests On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 1:03 PM, Teddy Gage wrote: > Hey I'm about to throw my 2GB 680 back in my main render machine, I'm > going to run a benchmark before I take out the 3GB 580 I have in there. > Some research suggests that the 3 GB 580 is more of a CUDA oriented > computing card so the differences may not actually be huge. > > I'll report back. Sorry for the deluge of replies gentlemen > > On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 12:54 PM, rendernyc wrote: > >> Hey todd, have you seen or done any tests on the 680 vs the older GTXs? >> >> >> >> On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Todd Kopriva wrote: >> >>> We just added support for a rather fast Kepler-class card, the GTX 680: >>> http://adobe.ly/Li3x61 >>> >>> It's less than your budget. >>> >>> > -----Original Message----- >>> > From: After Effects Mail List [mailto:AE-List@media-motion.tv] On >>> > Behalf Of Rick >>> > Sent: 25May2012 09:39 >>> > To: After Effects Mail List >>> > Subject: [AE] Best GFX card for AE/PP >>> > >>> > Engineering is taking my Quadro FX1800 out of my computer. It is on the >>> > lower end of CUDA enabled cards but does help. I put up a fight until >>> > my boss said I had a $1000.00 limit to get whatever card I want to >>> > replace it. I will be upgrading from CS4 Production Premium to Creative >>> > Cloud along with upgrading BCC7 AE to 8 and getting the card, hopefully >>> > all today. >>> > >>> > What is the best card I can get for that price? So far I've seen the >>> > Quadro 4000 for either $80 at a never before heard of place or $700 >>> > from NewEgg. >>> > http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814133324 >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > z600 8core 2.13Ghz >>> > >>> > 16GBs ram >>> > Windows 7 Pro >>> > >>> > Thanks, >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > Rick Emery >>> > www.rickemery.com >>> >>> +---End of message---+ >>> To unsubscribe send any message to >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> danny princz >> >> exposedideas.com >> > > > > -- > Animator & Editor > www.teddygage.com > Brooklyn > > -- danny princz exposedideas.com --bcaec54eeab618a14104c0df69e4 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable yah, id like to see some tests...

i believe its the &quo= t;NVIDIA = has dropped the shader clock with Kepler, opting instead to double the numb= er of CUDA cores to achieve the same effect,=A0"
I keep hearing how the 680 cuda performance is n= owhere more similar to=A0the=A0580 then=A0the=A03x cuda cores would suggest= but havent seen an AE tests


On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 1:03 PM, Teddy= Gage <teddygage@gmail.com> wrote:
Hey I'm about to throw my 2GB 680 back in my main render machine, I'= ;m going to run a benchmark before I take out the 3GB 580 I have in there. = Some research suggests that the 3 GB 580 is more of a CUDA oriented computi= ng card so the differences may not actually be huge.

I'll report back. Sorry for the deluge of replies gentlemen

=
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 12:54 = PM, rendernyc <rendernyc@gmail.com> wrote:
Hey todd, have you s= een or done any tests on the 680 vs the older GTXs?


=
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Todd Kopriva <kopriva@adobe.com><= /span> wrote:
We just a= dded support for a rather fast Kepler-class card, the GTX 680: http://adobe.ly/Li3x61

It's less than your budget.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: After Effects Mail List [mailto:AE-List@media-motion.tv] On
> Behalf Of Rick
> Sent: 25May2012 09:39
> To: After Effects Mail List
> Subject: [AE] Best GFX card for AE/PP
>
> Engineering is taking my Quadro FX1800 out of my computer. It is on th= e
> lower end of CUDA enabled cards but does help. I put up a fight until<= br> > my boss said I had a $1000.00 limit to get whatever card I want to
> replace it. I will be upgrading from CS4 Production Premium to Creativ= e
> Cloud along with upgrading BCC7 AE to 8 and getting the card, hopefull= y
> all today.
>
> What is the best card I can get for that price? So far I've seen t= he
> Quadro 4000 for either $80 at a never before heard of place or $700 > from NewEgg.
> http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item= =3DN82E16814133324
>
>
>
> z600 8core 2.13Ghz
>
> 16GBs ram
> Windows 7 Pro
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Rick Emery
> www.rickemery.c= om

+---End of message---+
To unsubscribe send any message to <ae-list-off@media-motion.tv>



-- <= br>danny princz

exposedideas.com



--
Animator & Editor
www.teddygage.co= m
Brooklyn




--
= danny princz

exposedideas.com
--bcaec54eeab618a14104c0df69e4--