| huh, do you main after effects 5.0? (sans the CS)
btw, a $300 GTX card is faster than a $1000 Q4000 for the raytracer
i bet a lot of these sub $1000 PC laptops with 525M cards are probably close to a q4000
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 8:47 PM, Rich Young <aefilter@yahoo.com> wrote:
CS5 is when AE got 3D features. It took 11 years to get extruded text (except for the cycles that shipped Invigorator), which was apparently designed for those comfortable buying a $1000 GPU for their tower computer.
Personally I'm OK with Nvidia acceleration, though my card is much slower in AE. I expect most already caught this article:
http://prolost.com/blog/2012/6/4/fast-ray-tracers.html
--- On Wed, 6/6/12, Daniel Ramirez <ramirezdan@gmail.com> wrote:
I'm not seeing how CS5 is relevant to the conversation.
The visit(s) I'm referring to were conducted Dec 2010 - Jan 2011.
In any case, I don't have a
time machine and if I did, I'd be watching the sun be born or maybe do something dinosaur related.
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 2:11 PM, Rich Young <aefilter@yahoo.com> wrote:
Too bad Adobe can't get on the same page as a company for 3D features. CS5 was a long time ago.
The customers we visited that were interested in doing simple text and shapes in 3D were comfortable buying a $1000 GPU for their tower computer in order to use the feature. It's possible we visited the wrong people,...
|
|
-- danny princz exposedideas.com
|