Robert, we flew people in an airplane to talk with customers about this
potential decision. If you want to equate that with survey monkey, or
simply don't want to believe it, there's nothing I can do to change your
mind.
The Quadro 4000 card was the most extensively tested card we used in the
CS6 cycle. We have limited testing resources and we chose to focus on
testing and certifying their professional level graphics cards. Those
videos probably mention quadro because they're likely using a system the
AE team recommended. We're not going to recommend configurations we
haven't extensively tested. If we decided to invest more time in testing
ray-traced 3D, we could have focused on benchmarking the quadro vs. the
gtx, but we decided to focus on testing things like our new caching
model and the 3D camera tracker instead. You mentioned CS6 was a good
release so I figure we made the right trade-offs.
No one is preventing you from using a cheaper card and I'm thrilled
there are lower cost alternatives that meet the needs of our users. We
take pride in offering a tool used by artists that can compete with much
more expensive solutions.
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 12:05 AM, Roland Kahlenberg (RoRK) <
aemaillist@broadcastgems.com > wrote: