Return-Path: <teddygage@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-ob0-f169.google.com ([209.85.214.169] verified)
  by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10)
  with ESMTP-TLS id 4739569 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Fri, 08 Jun 2012 17:18:29 +0200
Received: by obbwd18 with SMTP id wd18so2774370obb.28
        for <AE-List@media-motion.tv>; Fri, 08 Jun 2012 08:21:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :content-type;
        bh=2oVaJYammGDYS7sw3PBfXwzJuOVpRSa25Y82ykWvPCA=;
        b=ncNFeR1qxYXqhChotxUzUJeuYVWLs07eBfUARQU5daeU6PamxkWLgyGLx/olfCmDkR
         be08VXHrii5keccIWoEBCXrcb71xMd4KjvelfGBuwHtqfbs4rTMS/TU7XoNFfLgLyyJ7
         7mZt8VBKo7abLEVi8szs9vOqxG4M7V7JWHwcDod1KjVWjYkmEInS7mkU6HFNHnF6nIME
         pY3mBeNHhzxiUsiuuyDP8fhzlgS+myQ9u/iOBSxqgWtZKn083697TyzjHtMfqQwcBiKg
         CKGE7F23Phoz+r1hsyqctk+K3z8iwlY0hN5LD+Rr96cDUjRIloRRsshx63Db7u5FtOF1
         02sg==
Received: by 10.182.38.1 with SMTP id c1mr7146845obk.18.1339168860629; Fri, 08
 Jun 2012 08:21:00 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.182.80.167 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Jun 2012 08:20:15 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <list-4739544@media-motion.tv>
References: <list-4739544@media-motion.tv>
From: Teddy Gage <teddygage@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2012 11:20:15 -0400
Message-ID: <CAPdXPWetsVRiG=vUdDtPNoa=NtJgw4cbE9UAVeAmVvsXO0j8Xw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [AE] Why a raytraced renderer?
To: After Effects Mail List <AE-List@media-motion.tv>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d0447f32c3b6b7d04c1f78c0b

--f46d0447f32c3b6b7d04c1f78c0b
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

GTX 680 - 2 GB VRAM - clock speed 1096 MHZ

core i7 3930K (6 logical cores) overclocked to 4.7 gHZ

render time : 13 min 5 seconds = 780 seconds


GTX 580 - 3 GB VRAM - clock speed 866 MHZ

core i7 940 (4 cores) oc'd to 3.7 gHZ

render time 13 min 50 seconds = 830 seconds


So these results seem to imply there is a disk and / or CPU bottleneck in
your benchmark project, or there is something else going on. Maybe RAM
plays a factor. Because in my own benchmark tests with a different project,
I get different results, where the GTX 580 is faster, not the 680 in the
faster machine. Interesting...

On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 11:07 AM, rendernyc <rendernyc@gmail.com> wrote:

> email sent
>
> thanks
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 10:26 AM, Dave Bittner <dave@pixelworkshop.com>wrote:
>
>> I'm running a flashed 470 from eBay. I'll run the test and send you the
>> results.
>>
>> On Jun 7, 2012, at 5:41PM, rendernyc wrote:
>>
>> > yup, been testing lots of diff cards with the raytracer.
>> > want to run a test on your 570 for the chart?
>> >
>> > have the 285, 480, 580, 680, q4000 and q4800 so far
>> >
>> > was just saying that the only card someone from adobe could
>> "officially" talk about is the currently shipping q4000
>>
>>
>> +---End of message---+
>> To unsubscribe send any message to <ae-list-off@media-motion.tv>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> danny princz
>
> exposedideas.com
>



-- 
Animator & Editor
www.teddygage.com
Brooklyn

--f46d0447f32c3b6b7d04c1f78c0b
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

GTX 680 - 2 GB VRAM - clock speed 1096 MHZ<br><br>core i7 3930K (6 logical =
cores) overclocked to 4.7 gHZ<br><br>render time : 13 min 5 seconds =3D 780=
 seconds<br><br><br>GTX 580 - 3 GB VRAM - clock speed 866 MHZ<br><br>core i=
7 940 (4 cores) oc&#39;d to 3.7 gHZ<br>


<br>render time 13 min 50 seconds =3D 830 seconds<br><br><br>So these=20
results seem to imply there is a disk and / or CPU bottleneck in your=20
benchmark project, or there is something else going on. Maybe RAM plays a
 factor. Because in my own benchmark tests with a different project, I=20
get different results, where the GTX 580 is faster, not the 680 in the=20
faster machine. Interesting...<br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Fri, Ju=
n 8, 2012 at 11:07 AM, rendernyc <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:re=
ndernyc@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">rendernyc@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wro=
te:<br>

<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p=
x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">email sent<div><br></div><div>thanks<div><di=
v class=3D"h5"><br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 10=
:26 AM, Dave Bittner <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:dave@pixelwork=
shop.com" target=3D"_blank">dave@pixelworkshop.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br=
>


<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p=
x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">I&#39;m running a flashed 470 from eBay. I&#=
39;ll run the test and send you the results.<br>
<br>
On Jun 7, 2012, at 5:41PM, rendernyc wrote:<br>
<br>
&gt; yup, been testing lots of diff cards with the raytracer.<br>
&gt; want to run a test on your 570 for the chart?<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; have the 285, 480, 580, 680, q4000 and q4800 so far<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; was just saying that the only card someone from adobe could &quot;offi=
cially&quot; talk about is the currently shipping q4000<br>
<br>
<br>
+---End of message---+<br>
To unsubscribe send any message to &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:ae-list-off@media-=
motion.tv" target=3D"_blank">ae-list-off@media-motion.tv</a>&gt;<br>
</blockquote></div><br><br clear=3D"all"><div><br></div></div></div><span c=
lass=3D"HOEnZb"><font color=3D"#888888">-- <br>danny princz<br><br><a href=
=3D"http://exposedideas.com" target=3D"_blank">exposedideas.com</a><br>
</font></span></div>
</blockquote></div><br><br clear=3D"all"><br>-- <br><span style=3D"color:rg=
b(0,0,0)">Animator &amp; Editor</span><br style=3D"color:rgb(0,0,0)"><span =
style=3D"color:rgb(0,0,0)"><a href=3D"http://www.teddygage.com" target=3D"_=
blank">www.teddygage.com</a></span><br style=3D"color:rgb(0,0,0)">

<span style=3D"color:rgb(0,0,0)">Brooklyn</span><br><br>

--f46d0447f32c3b6b7d04c1f78c0b--