Return-Path: Received: from mail-vc0-f169.google.com ([209.85.220.169] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 4739580 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Fri, 08 Jun 2012 17:26:07 +0200 Received: by vcbfl10 with SMTP id fl10so1117319vcb.28 for ; Fri, 08 Jun 2012 08:28:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=OAsaKMmQsf3pxwYbRnqJfiO0A1jiklYvUW79rYn53xI=; b=HsYnpxWFdJHW7IDwos1N0ne1lf7gzMR0wMYwF//s2wIiaWDEif1JHpZzi1TrRfofts ziGv2884zak+PzrQTPG/deTMaXxT+GykH1ZE+U0llSaGU8SPPtcGcSlHP0WMrP2p7y+r 0qY/y5xKhsPQOF3PKyIzfyS97QXWh5Az9oZkvlIl1LdIgFAOXnbrx+L/5JwILy9kzzqr ftVir8GZ/1ScGsxDDqCbo2z1/E/IDxIbr98K6oNe2JGn0ZkSsUKcvEVrMmMaVJYUFrHy RZjg+6fgyYIe9DwqzqgrXxCdmP6rqCTy7kc9WzQRaivCth+/zGkPqKtNao9rkLbx3M9J wSDQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.149.15 with SMTP id r15mr6646299vcv.1.1339169318757; Fri, 08 Jun 2012 08:28:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.149.70 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Jun 2012 08:28:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2012 11:28:38 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [AE] Why a raytraced renderer? From: rendernyc To: After Effects Mail List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf3068480389e3ef04c1f7a765 --20cf3068480389e3ef04c1f7a765 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 interesting thats why we need more results... the 680 tested in a z800 rendered in 17:34 a 580 in an 2008 mac pro was 15:07 On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Teddy Gage wrote: > GTX 680 - 2 GB VRAM - clock speed 1096 MHZ > > core i7 3930K (6 logical cores) overclocked to 4.7 gHZ > > render time : 13 min 5 seconds = 780 seconds > > > GTX 580 - 3 GB VRAM - clock speed 866 MHZ > > core i7 940 (4 cores) oc'd to 3.7 gHZ > > render time 13 min 50 seconds = 830 seconds > > > So these results seem to imply there is a disk and / or CPU bottleneck in > your benchmark project, or there is something else going on. Maybe RAM > plays a factor. Because in my own benchmark tests with a different project, > I get different results, where the GTX 580 is faster, not the 680 in the > faster machine. Interesting... > > > On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 11:07 AM, rendernyc wrote: > >> email sent >> >> thanks >> >> >> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 10:26 AM, Dave Bittner wrote: >> >>> I'm running a flashed 470 from eBay. I'll run the test and send you the >>> results. >>> >>> On Jun 7, 2012, at 5:41PM, rendernyc wrote: >>> >>> > yup, been testing lots of diff cards with the raytracer. >>> > want to run a test on your 570 for the chart? >>> > >>> > have the 285, 480, 580, 680, q4000 and q4800 so far >>> > >>> > was just saying that the only card someone from adobe could >>> "officially" talk about is the currently shipping q4000 >>> >>> >>> +---End of message---+ >>> To unsubscribe send any message to >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> danny princz >> >> exposedideas.com >> > > > > -- > Animator & Editor > www.teddygage.com > Brooklyn > > -- danny princz exposedideas.com --20cf3068480389e3ef04c1f7a765 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable interesting
thats why we need more results...

= the 680 tested in a z800 rendered in 17:34
a 580 in an 2008 mac pro was= 15:07


On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at = 11:20 AM, Teddy Gage <teddygage@gmail.com> wrote:
GTX 680 - 2 GB VRAM - clock speed 1096 MHZ
core i7 3930K (6 logical cores) overclocked to 4.7 gHZ

render = time : 13 min 5 seconds =3D 780 seconds


GTX 580 - 3 GB VRAM - clock speed 866 MHZ

core i7 940 (4 cor= es) oc'd to 3.7 gHZ

render time 13 min 50 seconds =3D 830 seconds


So these=20 results seem to imply there is a disk and / or CPU bottleneck in your=20 benchmark project, or there is something else going on. Maybe RAM plays a factor. Because in my own benchmark tests with a different project, I=20 get different results, where the GTX 580 is faster, not the 680 in the=20 faster machine. Interesting...

<= br>
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 11:07 AM, rendernyc <rendernyc@gmail.com> wrote:
email sent

thanks


On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 10:26 AM, Dave = Bittner <dave@pixelworkshop.com> wrote:
I'm running a flashed 470 from eBay. I&#= 39;ll run the test and send you the results.

On Jun 7, 2012, at 5:41PM, rendernyc wrote:

> yup, been testing lots of diff cards with the raytracer.
> want to run a test on your 570 for the chart?
>
> have the 285, 480, 580, 680, q4000 and q4800 so far
>
> was just saying that the only card someone from adobe could "offi= cially" talk about is the currently shipping q4000


+---End of message---+
To unsubscribe send any message to <ae-list-off@media-motion.tv>



<= font color=3D"#888888">--
danny princz

exposedideas.com



--
Animator & Editor
www.teddygage.com
Brooklyn




-- danny princz

exposedideas.com<= /a>
--20cf3068480389e3ef04c1f7a765--