Return-Path: Received: from mail-we0-f169.google.com ([74.125.82.169] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 4739632 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Fri, 08 Jun 2012 17:36:55 +0200 Received: by wefh52 with SMTP id h52so747078wef.28 for ; Fri, 08 Jun 2012 08:39:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=FowWbkOVJ43cT8ZA2klXHhPz/c6h+vrSkxzEzN3+WdE=; b=fZ1c76yxXfSJ27g7AGJtNwTpQMRKOTob3ByVfr1co5AsHstc4sLi7T7KcEZqDnTbs9 6Dc2T8W647UiuKH/e1RDVSqMxYRDofPsr+Uw6DgQaG2DKyw/YWtjduMhCH+JCtk2LYG/ YCTZMzGt/3Uh2zzrWGth0VQXBSAXVTBszp/MPmhimzMTG4Pzq1pR/J3VWSCm2SeVqDGE Im0nDgdFd3AYNtXuy9FphBjeaNgNdmQO87b54UURtoNjoy15cb2UwAqaWkrUQnQG5QvO SxHMMobM68BNJN6gI4PmNbLlWJfp4gsjcXPOk/o0hERd0WidBYKpdXfMeLYH858hLOC8 5uwg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.200.22 with SMTP id y22mr1563842wen.118.1339169967821; Fri, 08 Jun 2012 08:39:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.216.76 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Jun 2012 08:39:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2012 11:39:27 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [AE] Why a raytraced renderer? From: Andrew Embury To: After Effects Mail List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6de000139d3d404c1f7ce01 --0016e6de000139d3d404c1f7ce01 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 For the performance to cost ratio....WOW! That's phenomenal! Now, the 580 is cutting that time by 3 minutes is that correct? Cheers. - Andrew On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 11:36 AM, rendernyc wrote: > 480 in a 12 core macpro was 16:21 > > > On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Andrew Embury wrote: > >> What about the 480? Did that not score between the 580 and 680? >> >> I'd be very interested to see that. >> >> Cheers. >> >> - Andrew >> >> >> >> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 11:28 AM, rendernyc wrote: >> >>> interesting >>> thats why we need more results... >>> >>> the 680 tested in a z800 rendered in 17:34 >>> a 580 in an 2008 mac pro was 15:07 >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Teddy Gage wrote: >>> >>>> GTX 680 - 2 GB VRAM - clock speed 1096 MHZ >>>> >>>> core i7 3930K (6 logical cores) overclocked to 4.7 gHZ >>>> >>>> render time : 13 min 5 seconds = 780 seconds >>>> >>>> >>>> GTX 580 - 3 GB VRAM - clock speed 866 MHZ >>>> >>>> core i7 940 (4 cores) oc'd to 3.7 gHZ >>>> >>>> render time 13 min 50 seconds = 830 seconds >>>> >>>> >>>> So these results seem to imply there is a disk and / or CPU bottleneck >>>> in your benchmark project, or there is something else going on. Maybe RAM >>>> plays a factor. Because in my own benchmark tests with a different project, >>>> I get different results, where the GTX 580 is faster, not the 680 in the >>>> faster machine. Interesting... >>>> >>>> >>>> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 11:07 AM, rendernyc wrote: >>>> >>>>> email sent >>>>> >>>>> thanks >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 10:26 AM, Dave Bittner wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I'm running a flashed 470 from eBay. I'll run the test and send you >>>>>> the results. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Jun 7, 2012, at 5:41PM, rendernyc wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> > yup, been testing lots of diff cards with the raytracer. >>>>>> > want to run a test on your 570 for the chart? >>>>>> > >>>>>> > have the 285, 480, 580, 680, q4000 and q4800 so far >>>>>> > >>>>>> > was just saying that the only card someone from adobe could >>>>>> "officially" talk about is the currently shipping q4000 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> +---End of message---+ >>>>>> To unsubscribe send any message to >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> danny princz >>>>> >>>>> exposedideas.com >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Animator & Editor >>>> www.teddygage.com >>>> Brooklyn >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> danny princz >>> >>> exposedideas.com >>> >> >> > > > -- > danny princz > > exposedideas.com > --0016e6de000139d3d404c1f7ce01 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable For the performance to cost ratio....WOW! That's phenomenal!

Now= , the 580 is cutting that time by 3 minutes is that correct?

Cheers.=

- Andrew

On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 1= 1:36 AM, rendernyc <rendernyc@gmail.com> wrote:
480 in a 12 core macpro was 16:21


On Fri, Ju= n 8, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Andrew Embury <aembury@gmail.com> wro= te:
What about the 480? Did that not score betwe= en the 580 and 680?

I'd be very interested to see that.

Cheers.

- Andrew



= On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 11:28 AM, rendernyc <rendernyc@gmail.com><= /span> wrote:
interesting
thats why we need more resul= ts...

the 680 tested in a z800 rendered in 17:34 a 580 in an 2008 mac pro was 15:07


On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Teddy Gage <teddygage@gmail.com> wrote:
GTX 680 - 2 GB VRAM - clock speed 1096 MHZ
core i7 3930K (6 logical cores) overclocked to 4.7 gHZ

render = time : 13 min 5 seconds =3D 780 seconds


GTX 580 - 3 GB VRAM - clock speed 866 MHZ

core i7 940 (4 cor= es) oc'd to 3.7 gHZ

render time 13 min 50 seconds =3D 830 seconds


So these=20 results seem to imply there is a disk and / or CPU bottleneck in your=20 benchmark project, or there is something else going on. Maybe RAM plays a factor. Because in my own benchmark tests with a different project, I=20 get different results, where the GTX 580 is faster, not the 680 in the=20 faster machine. Interesting...


= On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 11:07 AM, rendernyc <rendernyc@gmail.com><= /span> wrote:
email sent

thanks


On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 10:26 AM, Dave = Bittner <dave@pixelworkshop.com> wrote:
I'm running a flashed 470 from eBay. I&#= 39;ll run the test and send you the results.

On Jun 7, 2012, at 5:41PM, rendernyc wrote:

> yup, been testing lots of diff cards with the raytracer.
> want to run a test on your 570 for the chart?
>
> have the 285, 480, 580, 680, q4000 and q4800 so far
>
> was just saying that the only card someone from adobe could "offi= cially" talk about is the currently shipping q4000


+---End of message---+
To unsubscribe send any message to <ae-list-off@media-motion.tv>



<= font color=3D"#888888">--
danny princz

exposedideas.com



=
--
Animator & Editor
www.teddygage.= com
Brooklyn




--
danny princz

exposedideas.com




<= /div>--
danny princz
=
exposedideas.com<= /a>

--0016e6de000139d3d404c1f7ce01--