Return-Path: Received: from mail-vb0-f41.google.com ([209.85.212.41] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 4739690 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Fri, 08 Jun 2012 18:14:08 +0200 Received: by vbkv13 with SMTP id v13so404554vbk.28 for ; Fri, 08 Jun 2012 09:16:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=YgrjNsaVY5YWT9zNM4f84eDW06n41aAhsalibn1Nxk0=; b=zEZkzCYIhKPii0ARNc8xKVe6lgEYMtWIRIMF/mNAHI+H2hWFR55PpdULD7FXtBmNql ZhN2SWzdJbZi/MJ3Pj6ll7vg0zl+6oQ6nG9DOdgXXX4q5TGoJy8q+JHvy+EopuFvhqVF sedz/NYUpoJQzaSRmz+xywe8qQYqqJI5i3lLBWhx5SRfQ96550HjWczlsOYH/1FWGLdK jUfVtmk1Ld4+Fv9BTVPyW9a+06EOa++7Vdfhd8H4RHfrla5HOyRh+xG5V0vJOr+I0048 pNtMJOmpi5gMdSsFjTLvt+V+al10g7UvvVWUWjK/VNdPbkzT4MChkEwpOyvt7nbrdUW9 r6pg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.150.12 with SMTP id w12mr6756307vcv.39.1339172199522; Fri, 08 Jun 2012 09:16:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.149.70 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Jun 2012 09:16:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2012 12:16:39 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [AE] Why a raytraced renderer? From: rendernyc To: After Effects Mail List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d043890973edfc804c1f85339 --f46d043890973edfc804c1f85339 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 if ANYONE has one of the cards tested already or a different one and wouldnt mind popping off a render please email me so we can get more results danny On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 12:06 PM, Andrew Embury wrote: > Fantastic! > > Thank you ever so much for doing this. This is truly phenomenal of the > user group to come together to make this all possible. > > Cheers. > > - Andrew > > > On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 11:59 AM, rendernyc wrote: > >> The 480 uses more power than the 5XX >> im expecting the 570 to be about the same speed as the 480 while using >> less power >> >> waiting for some tests on that one >> >> >> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 11:57 AM, rendernyc wrote: >> >>> we had the 580 at 15:07 >>> so 480 was about 8% slower >>> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Andrew Embury wrote: >>> >>>> For the performance to cost ratio....WOW! That's phenomenal! >>>> >>>> Now, the 580 is cutting that time by 3 minutes is that correct? >>>> >>>> Cheers. >>>> >>>> - Andrew >>>> >>>> >>>> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 11:36 AM, rendernyc wrote: >>>> >>>>> 480 in a 12 core macpro was 16:21 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Andrew Embury wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> What about the 480? Did that not score between the 580 and 680? >>>>>> >>>>>> I'd be very interested to see that. >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers. >>>>>> >>>>>> - Andrew >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 11:28 AM, rendernyc wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> interesting >>>>>>> thats why we need more results... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> the 680 tested in a z800 rendered in 17:34 >>>>>>> a 580 in an 2008 mac pro was 15:07 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Teddy Gage wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> GTX 680 - 2 GB VRAM - clock speed 1096 MHZ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> core i7 3930K (6 logical cores) overclocked to 4.7 gHZ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> render time : 13 min 5 seconds = 780 seconds >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> GTX 580 - 3 GB VRAM - clock speed 866 MHZ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> core i7 940 (4 cores) oc'd to 3.7 gHZ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> render time 13 min 50 seconds = 830 seconds >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> So these results seem to imply there is a disk and / or CPU >>>>>>>> bottleneck in your benchmark project, or there is something else going on. >>>>>>>> Maybe RAM plays a factor. Because in my own benchmark tests with a >>>>>>>> different project, I get different results, where the GTX 580 is faster, >>>>>>>> not the 680 in the faster machine. Interesting... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 11:07 AM, rendernyc wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> email sent >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> thanks >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 10:26 AM, Dave Bittner < >>>>>>>>> dave@pixelworkshop.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I'm running a flashed 470 from eBay. I'll run the test and send >>>>>>>>>> you the results. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Jun 7, 2012, at 5:41PM, rendernyc wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> > yup, been testing lots of diff cards with the raytracer. >>>>>>>>>> > want to run a test on your 570 for the chart? >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > have the 285, 480, 580, 680, q4000 and q4800 so far >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > was just saying that the only card someone from adobe could >>>>>>>>>> "officially" talk about is the currently shipping q4000 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> +---End of message---+ >>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe send any message to >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> danny princz >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> exposedideas.com >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Animator & Editor >>>>>>>> www.teddygage.com >>>>>>>> Brooklyn >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> danny princz >>>>>>> >>>>>>> exposedideas.com >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> danny princz >>>>> >>>>> exposedideas.com >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> danny princz >>> >>> exposedideas.com >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> danny princz >> >> exposedideas.com >> > > -- danny princz exposedideas.com --f46d043890973edfc804c1f85339 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable if ANYONE has one of the cards tested already or a different one and wouldn= t mind popping off a render please email me so we can get more results
=
danny

On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 = at 12:06 PM, Andrew Embury <aembury@gmail.com> wrote:
Fantastic!

Thank you ever so much for= doing this. This is truly phenomenal of the user group to come together to= make this all possible.

Cheers.

- Andrew<= /font>


On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 11:59 AM, rendernyc &= lt;rendernyc@gmail= .com> wrote:
The 480 uses more power than the 5XX
im = expecting the 570 to be about the same speed as the 480 while using less po= wer

waiting for some tests on that one


On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 11:57 AM, rendernyc <rend= ernyc@gmail.com> wrote:
we had the 580 at 15:07=A0
so 480 was ab= out 8% slower



On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Andrew Embury <aembury@gmail.com><= /span> wrote:
For the performance to cost ratio....WOW! Th= at's phenomenal!

Now, the 580 is cutting that time by 3 minutes = is that correct?

Cheers.

- Andrew


On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 11:36 AM, r= endernyc <rendernyc@gmail.com> wrote:
480 in a 12 core macpro was 16:21
<= br>
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Andrew E= mbury <aembury@gmail.com> wrote:
What about the 480? Did that not score betwe= en the 580 and 680?

I'd be very interested to see that.

Cheers.

- Andrew



= On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 11:28 AM, rendernyc <rendernyc@gmail.com><= /span> wrote:
interesting
thats why we need more resul= ts...

the 680 tested in a z800 rendered in 17:34 a 580 in an 2008 mac pro was 15:07


On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Teddy Gage <teddygage@gmail.com> wrote:
GTX 680 - 2 GB VRAM - clock speed 1096 MHZ
core i7 3930K (6 logical cores) overclocked to 4.7 gHZ

render = time : 13 min 5 seconds =3D 780 seconds


GTX 580 - 3 GB VRAM - clock speed 866 MHZ

core i7 940 (4 cor= es) oc'd to 3.7 gHZ

render time 13 min 50 seconds =3D 830 seconds


So these=20 results seem to imply there is a disk and / or CPU bottleneck in your=20 benchmark project, or there is something else going on. Maybe RAM plays a factor. Because in my own benchmark tests with a different project, I=20 get different results, where the GTX 580 is faster, not the 680 in the=20 faster machine. Interesting...


= On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 11:07 AM, rendernyc <rendernyc@gmail.com><= /span> wrote:
email sent

thanks


On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 10:26 AM, Dave = Bittner <dave@pixelworkshop.com> wrote:
I'm running a flashed 470 from eBay. I&#= 39;ll run the test and send you the results.

On Jun 7, 2012, at 5:41PM, rendernyc wrote:

> yup, been testing lots of diff cards with the raytracer.
> want to run a test on your 570 for the chart?
>
> have the 285, 480, 580, 680, q4000 and q4800 so far
>
> was just saying that the only card someone from adobe could "offi= cially" talk about is the currently shipping q4000


+---End of message---+
To unsubscribe send any message to <ae-list-off@media-motion.tv>



<= font color=3D"#888888">--
danny princz

exposedideas.com



=
--
Animator & Editor
www.teddygage.= com
Brooklyn




--
danny princz

exposedideas.com




<= /div>--
danny princz

exposedideas.com




<= /div>--
danny princz

exposedideas.com


<= font color=3D"#888888">--
danny princz

exposedideas.com



--
= danny princz

exposedideas.com
--f46d043890973edfc804c1f85339--