Return-Path: Received: from mail-vc0-f169.google.com ([209.85.220.169] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 4739735 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Fri, 08 Jun 2012 18:28:09 +0200 Received: by vcbfl10 with SMTP id fl10so1168638vcb.28 for ; Fri, 08 Jun 2012 09:30:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=iojpALGW2qFf6aohnaPKGq5n0EVunQ9NBVpnyvCIVQ4=; b=oXJuyHoY/QQEGRTYHeras2kEJxsCgqABwXq/YqIZo4A588SPi9T6JUJlGf2VWsPJXz coaVVKgkzmDZ0dDwfk/Lyfm6gE1MEBjNAIrK5vA6cp/v90B7tz379nX9halGVGaQf1SK BEyg7P6Vqmo+fSiuFmpiP2wjNtIyA+prdE9R29sQlQ9C947bAB74/vtUf8uQeMUulJWg cKfsWmyZ9X3R/pOjM2jg1go0cWdZq2gfxw0YawgY0gNvxwcZjkzFuwYxIr9+8RQJZrmT 71RW4FqnfkFOes0jGOIP1OZa+bMWdluy0QaPo+pmACe6n19BJvcYhOLkbryRn675/x7N kWRQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.156.10 with SMTP id u10mr6832382vcw.20.1339173040885; Fri, 08 Jun 2012 09:30:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.149.70 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Jun 2012 09:30:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2012 12:30:40 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [AE] Why a raytraced renderer? From: rendernyc To: After Effects Mail List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d0438909365106204c1f8850f --f46d0438909365106204c1f8850f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 did a little test with lloyd the other day that had some extuded text with a reflective floor. 2008 macpro CPU render was abotu 15mins. he turned on his 8800GT that is not supported and it rendered in about 7 mins. on a q4000 the same scene took 37 seconds On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 12:26 PM, rendernyc wrote: > CPU based render? > > > On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Greg Balint wrote: > >> Danny, could you do a test for me on the same project file with the 580 >> turned off? Just to see how much the Nvidia cards are helping the situation? >> >> ////Greg Balint >> ///Art Director / Motion Graphics Designer >> delRAZOR.com/ >> >> On Jun 8, 2012, at 12:16 PM, rendernyc wrote: >> >> if ANYONE has one of the cards tested already or a different one and >> wouldnt mind popping off a render please email me so we can get more results >> >> danny >> >> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 12:06 PM, Andrew Embury wrote: >> >>> Fantastic! >>> >>> Thank you ever so much for doing this. This is truly phenomenal of the >>> user group to come together to make this all possible. >>> >>> Cheers. >>> >>> - Andrew >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 11:59 AM, rendernyc wrote: >>> >>>> The 480 uses more power than the 5XX >>>> im expecting the 570 to be about the same speed as the 480 while using >>>> less power >>>> >>>> waiting for some tests on that one >>>> >>>> >>>> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 11:57 AM, rendernyc wrote: >>>> >>>>> we had the 580 at 15:07 >>>>> so 480 was about 8% slower >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Andrew Embury wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> For the performance to cost ratio....WOW! That's phenomenal! >>>>>> >>>>>> Now, the 580 is cutting that time by 3 minutes is that correct? >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers. >>>>>> >>>>>> - Andrew >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 11:36 AM, rendernyc wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> 480 in a 12 core macpro was 16:21 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Andrew Embury wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> What about the 480? Did that not score between the 580 and 680? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I'd be very interested to see that. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Cheers. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> - Andrew >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 11:28 AM, rendernyc wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> interesting >>>>>>>>> thats why we need more results... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> the 680 tested in a z800 rendered in 17:34 >>>>>>>>> a 580 in an 2008 mac pro was 15:07 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Teddy Gage wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> GTX 680 - 2 GB VRAM - clock speed 1096 MHZ >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> core i7 3930K (6 logical cores) overclocked to 4.7 gHZ >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> render time : 13 min 5 seconds = 780 seconds >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> GTX 580 - 3 GB VRAM - clock speed 866 MHZ >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> core i7 940 (4 cores) oc'd to 3.7 gHZ >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> render time 13 min 50 seconds = 830 seconds >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> So these results seem to imply there is a disk and / or CPU >>>>>>>>>> bottleneck in your benchmark project, or there is something else going on. >>>>>>>>>> Maybe RAM plays a factor. Because in my own benchmark tests with a >>>>>>>>>> different project, I get different results, where the GTX 580 is faster, >>>>>>>>>> not the 680 in the faster machine. Interesting... >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 11:07 AM, rendernyc wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> email sent >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> thanks >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 10:26 AM, Dave Bittner < >>>>>>>>>>> dave@pixelworkshop.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I'm running a flashed 470 from eBay. I'll run the test and send >>>>>>>>>>>> you the results. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Jun 7, 2012, at 5:41PM, rendernyc wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> > yup, been testing lots of diff cards with the raytracer. >>>>>>>>>>>> > want to run a test on your 570 for the chart? >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > have the 285, 480, 580, 680, q4000 and q4800 so far >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > was just saying that the only card someone from adobe could >>>>>>>>>>>> "officially" talk about is the currently shipping q4000 >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> +---End of message---+ >>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe send any message to >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>> danny princz >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> exposedideas.com >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> Animator & Editor >>>>>>>>>> www.teddygage.com >>>>>>>>>> Brooklyn >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> danny princz >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> exposedideas.com >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> danny princz >>>>>>> >>>>>>> exposedideas.com >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> danny princz >>>>> >>>>> exposedideas.com >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> danny princz >>>> >>>> exposedideas.com >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> danny princz >> >> exposedideas.com >> >> > > > -- > danny princz > > exposedideas.com > -- danny princz exposedideas.com --f46d0438909365106204c1f8850f Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable did a little test with lloyd the other day that had some extuded text with = a reflective floor. 2008 macpro CPU render was abotu 15mins. he turned on h= is 8800GT that is not supported and it rendered in about 7 mins. on a q4000= the same scene took 37 seconds



On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 = at 12:26 PM, rendernyc <rendernyc@gmail.com> wrote:
CPU based render?


On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Greg Balint <greg@d= elrazor.com> wrote:
Danny, could you do a test for me on the same= project file with the 580 turned off? Just to see how much the Nvidia card= s are helping the situation?

////Greg Balint
///Art Director / Motion Graphics Designer
delRAZOR.com/

On Jun 8, 2012, at 12:16 PM, render= nyc <rendernyc@= gmail.com> wrote:

if ANYONE = has one of the cards tested already or a different one and wouldnt mind pop= ping off a render please email me so we can get more results

danny

On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 12:06 P= M, Andrew Embury <aembury@gmail.com> wrote:
Fantastic!

Thank you ever so much for= doing this. This is truly phenomenal of the user group to come together to= make this all possible.

Cheers.

- Andrew


On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 11:59 AM, r= endernyc <rendernyc@gmail.com> wrote:
The 480 uses more power than the 5XX
im = expecting the 570 to be about the same speed as the 480 while using less po= wer

waiting for some tests on that one


On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 11:57 AM, rendernyc <rend= ernyc@gmail.com> wrote:
we had the 580 at 15:07=A0
so 480 was ab= out 8% slower



On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Andrew Embury <aembury@gmail.com><= /span> wrote:
For the performance to cost ratio....WOW! Th= at's phenomenal!

Now, the 580 is cutting that time by 3 minutes = is that correct?

Cheers.

- Andrew


On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 11:36 AM, r= endernyc <rendernyc@gmail.com> wrote:
480 in a 12 core macpro was 16:21
<= br>
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Andrew E= mbury <aembury@gmail.com> wrote:
What about the 480? Did that not score betwe= en the 580 and 680?

I'd be very interested to see that.

Cheers.

- Andrew



= On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 11:28 AM, rendernyc <rendernyc@gmail.com><= /span> wrote:
interesting
thats why we need more resul= ts...

the 680 tested in a z800 rendered in 17:34 a 580 in an 2008 mac pro was 15:07


On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Teddy Gage <teddygage@gmail.com> wrote:
GTX 680 - 2 GB VRAM - clock speed 1096 MHZ
core i7 3930K (6 logical cores) overclocked to 4.7 gHZ

render = time : 13 min 5 seconds =3D 780 seconds


GTX 580 - 3 GB VRAM - clock speed 866 MHZ

core i7 940 (4 cor= es) oc'd to 3.7 gHZ

render time 13 min 50 seconds =3D 830 seconds


So these=20 results seem to imply there is a disk and / or CPU bottleneck in your=20 benchmark project, or there is something else going on. Maybe RAM plays a factor. Because in my own benchmark tests with a different project, I=20 get different results, where the GTX 580 is faster, not the 680 in the=20 faster machine. Interesting...


= On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 11:07 AM, rendernyc <rendernyc@gmail.com><= /span> wrote:
email sent

thanks


On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 10:26 AM, Dave = Bittner <dave@pixelworkshop.com> wrote:
I'm running a flashed 470 from eBay. I&#= 39;ll run the test and send you the results.

On Jun 7, 2012, at 5:41PM, rendernyc wrote:

> yup, been testing lots of diff cards with the raytracer.
> want to run a test on your 570 for the chart?
>
> have the 285, 480, 580, 680, q4000 and q4800 so far
>
> was just saying that the only card someone from adobe could "offi= cially" talk about is the currently shipping q4000


+---End of message---+
To unsubscribe send any message to <ae-list-off@media-motion.tv>



<= font color=3D"#888888">--
danny princz

exposedideas.com



=
--
Animator & Editor
www.teddygage.= com
Brooklyn




--
danny princz

exposedideas.com




<= /div>--
danny princz

exposedideas.com




<= /div>--
danny princz

exposedideas.com



<= font color=3D"#888888">--
danny princz

exposedideas.com




--
= danny princz

e= xposedideas.com



--
danny princz

exposedideas.com



--
= danny princz

exposedideas.com
--f46d0438909365106204c1f8850f--