Return-Path: Received: from smtpoutwbe08.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net ([208.109.78.210] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with SMTP id 4739876 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Fri, 08 Jun 2012 20:32:41 +0200 Received: (qmail 17218 invoked from network); 8 Jun 2012 18:35:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) (72.167.218.142) by smtpoutwbe08.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net with SMTP; 8 Jun 2012 18:35:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 11098 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jun 2012 18:35:14 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-Originating-IP: 75.83.206.115 User-Agent: Workspace Webmail 5.6.18 Message-Id: <20120608113513.89259f98f291d771214680e8971719cb.6b141ec8ab.wbe@email04.secureserver.net> From: "Robert W. Walker" To: "After Effects Mail List" Subject: RE: [AE] Why a raytraced =?UTF-8?Q?renderer=3F?= Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2012 11:35:13 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 http://www.teddygage.com/AEBENCHCS6/=0A=0A> -------- Original Message -----= ---=0A> Subject: Re: [AE] Why a raytraced renderer?=0A> From: Steve Oakley = =0A> Date: Fri, June 08, 2012 2:32 pm=0A> To: "After= Effects Mail List" =0A> =0A> =0A> can you send me= a link to the project... =0A> =0A> S=0A> =0A> =0A> On Jun 8, 2012, at 11:1= 6 AM, rendernyc wrote:=0A> =0A> > if ANYONE has one of the cards tested alr= eady or a different one and wouldnt mind popping off a render please email = me so we can get more results=0A> > =0A> > danny=0A> > =0A> > On Fri, Jun 8= , 2012 at 12:06 PM, Andrew Embury wrote:=0A> > Fantasti= c!=0A> > =0A> > Thank you ever so much for doing this. This is truly phenom= enal of the user group to come together to make this all possible.=0A> > = =0A> > Cheers.=0A> > =0A> > - Andrew=0A> > =0A> > =0A> > On Fri, Jun 8, 201= 2 at 11:59 AM, rendernyc wrote:=0A> > The 480 uses mo= re power than the 5XX=0A> > im expecting the 570 to be about the same speed= as the 480 while using less power=0A> > =0A> > waiting for some tests on t= hat one=0A> > =0A> > =0A> > On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 11:57 AM, rendernyc wrote:=0A> > we had the 580 at 15:07 =0A> > so 480 was ab= out 8% slower=0A> > =0A> > =0A> > =0A> > On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 11:39 AM, A= ndrew Embury wrote:=0A> > For the performance to cost r= atio....WOW! That's phenomenal!=0A> > =0A> > Now, the 580 is cutting that t= ime by 3 minutes is that correct?=0A> > =0A> > Cheers.=0A> > =0A> > - Andre= w=0A> > =0A> > =0A> > On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 11:36 AM, rendernyc wrote:=0A> > 480 in a 12 core macpro was 16:21=0A> > =0A> > =0A= > > On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Andrew Embury wrot= e:=0A> > What about the 480? Did that not score between the 580 and 680?=0A= > > =0A> > I'd be very interested to see that.=0A> > =0A> > Cheers.=0A> > = =0A> > - Andrew=0A> > =0A> > =0A> > =0A> > On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 11:28 AM,= rendernyc wrote:=0A> > interesting=0A> > thats why w= e need more results...=0A> > =0A> > the 680 tested in a z800 rendered in 17= :34=0A> > a 580 in an 2008 mac pro was 15:07=0A> > =0A> > =0A> > On Fri, Ju= n 8, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Teddy Gage wrote:=0A> > GTX 68= 0 - 2 GB VRAM - clock speed 1096 MHZ=0A> > =0A> > core i7 3930K (6 logical = cores) overclocked to 4.7 gHZ=0A> > =0A> > render time : 13 min 5 seconds = =3D 780 seconds=0A> > =0A> > =0A> > GTX 580 - 3 GB VRAM - clock speed 866 M= HZ=0A> > =0A> > core i7 940 (4 cores) oc'd to 3.7 gHZ=0A> > =0A> > render t= ime 13 min 50 seconds =3D 830 seconds=0A> > =0A> > =0A> > So these results = seem to imply there is a disk and / or CPU bottleneck in your benchmark pro= ject, or there is something else going on. Maybe RAM plays a factor. Becaus= e in my own benchmark tests with a different project, I get different resul= ts, where the GTX 580 is faster, not the 680 in the faster machine. Interes= ting...=0A> > =0A> > =0A> > On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 11:07 AM, rendernyc wrote:=0A> > email sent=0A> > =0A> > thanks=0A> > =0A> > = =0A> > On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 10:26 AM, Dave Bittner wrote:=0A> > I'm running a flashed 470 from eBay. I'll run the test and = send you the results.=0A> > =0A> > On Jun 7, 2012, at 5:41PM, rendernyc wro= te:=0A> > =0A> > > yup, been testing lots of diff cards with the raytracer.= =0A> > > want to run a test on your 570 for the chart?=0A> > >=0A> > > have= the 285, 480, 580, 680, q4000 and q4800 so far=0A> > >=0A> > > was just sa= ying that the only card someone from adobe could "officially" talk about is= the currently shipping q4000=0A> > =0A> > =0A> > +---End of message---+=0A= > > To unsubscribe send any message to =0A> > = =0A> > =0A> > =0A> > -- =0A> > danny princz=0A> > =0A> > exposedideas.com= =0A> > =0A> > =0A> > =0A> > -- =0A> > Animator & Editor=0A> > www.teddygage= .com=0A> > Brooklyn=0A> > =0A> > =0A> > =0A> > =0A> > -- =0A> > danny princ= z=0A> > =0A> > exposedideas.com=0A> > =0A> > =0A> > =0A> > =0A> > -- =0A> >= danny princz=0A> > =0A> > exposedideas.com=0A> > =0A> > =0A> > =0A> > =0A>= > -- =0A> > danny princz=0A> > =0A> > exposedideas.com=0A> > =0A> > =0A> >= =0A> > -- =0A> > danny princz=0A> > =0A> > exposedideas.com=0A> > =0A> > = =0A> > =0A> > =0A> > -- =0A> > danny princz=0A> > =0A> > exposedideas.com= =0A