> can you send me a link to the project...
>
> S
>
>
> On Jun 8, 2012, at 11:16 AM, rendernyc wrote:
>
> > if ANYONE has one of the cards tested already or a different one and wouldnt mind popping off a render please email me so we can get more results
> >
> > danny
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 12:06 PM, Andrew Embury <
aembury@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Fantastic!
> >
> > Thank you ever so much for doing this. This is truly phenomenal of the user group to come together to make this all possible.
> >
> > Cheers.
> >
> > - Andrew
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 11:59 AM, rendernyc <
rendernyc@gmail.com> wrote:
> > The 480 uses more power than the 5XX
> > im expecting the 570 to be about the same speed as the 480 while using less power
> >
> > waiting for some tests on that one
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 11:57 AM, rendernyc <
rendernyc@gmail.com> wrote:
> > we had the 580 at 15:07
> > so 480 was about 8% slower
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Andrew Embury <
aembury@gmail.com> wrote:
> > For the performance to cost ratio....WOW! That's phenomenal!
> >
> > Now, the 580 is cutting that time by 3 minutes is that correct?
> >
> > Cheers.
> >
> > - Andrew
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 11:36 AM, rendernyc <
rendernyc@gmail.com> wrote:
> > 480 in a 12 core macpro was 16:21
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Andrew Embury <
aembury@gmail.com> wrote:
> > What about the 480? Did that not score between the 580 and 680?
> >
> > I'd be very interested to see that.
> >
> > Cheers.
> >
> > - Andrew
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 11:28 AM, rendernyc <
rendernyc@gmail.com> wrote:
> > interesting
> > thats why we need more results...
> >
> > the 680 tested in a z800 rendered in 17:34
> > a 580 in an 2008 mac pro was 15:07
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Teddy Gage <
teddygage@gmail.com> wrote:
> > GTX 680 - 2 GB VRAM - clock speed 1096 MHZ
> >
> > core i7 3930K (6 logical cores) overclocked to 4.7 gHZ
> >
> > render time : 13 min 5 seconds = 780 seconds
> >
> >
> > GTX 580 - 3 GB VRAM - clock speed 866 MHZ
> >
> > core i7 940 (4 cores) oc'd to 3.7 gHZ
> >
> > render time 13 min 50 seconds = 830 seconds
> >
> >
> > So these results seem to imply there is a disk and / or CPU bottleneck in your benchmark project, or there is something else going on. Maybe RAM plays a factor. Because in my own benchmark tests with a different project, I get different results, where the GTX 580 is faster, not the 680 in the faster machine. Interesting...
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 11:07 AM, rendernyc <
rendernyc@gmail.com> wrote:
> > email sent
> >
> > thanks
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 10:26 AM, Dave Bittner <
dave@pixelworkshop.com> wrote:
> > I'm running a flashed 470 from eBay. I'll run the test and send you the results.
> >
> > On Jun 7, 2012, at 5:41PM, rendernyc wrote:
> >
> > > yup, been testing lots of diff cards with the raytracer.
> > > want to run a test on your 570 for the chart?
> > >
> > > have the 285, 480, 580, 680, q4000 and q4800 so far
> > >
> > > was just saying that the only card someone from adobe could "officially" talk about is the currently shipping q4000
> >
> >
> > +---End of message---+
> > To unsubscribe send any message to <
ae-list-off@media-motion.tv>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > danny princz
> >
> >
exposedideas.com
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Animator & Editor
> >
www.teddygage.com
> > Brooklyn
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > danny princz
> >
> >
exposedideas.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > danny princz
> >
> >
exposedideas.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > danny princz
> >
> >
exposedideas.com
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > danny princz
> >
> >
exposedideas.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > danny princz
> >
> >
exposedideas.com
+---End of message---+
To unsubscribe send any message to <
ae-list-off@media-motion.tv>
