| ||||||||||
| AEbenchCS6 : the original output module didn't work on my machine, so I rendered TGA sequence, no compression to a 10K drive : 7min 5sec however, with rays set to 5, this isn't much of a test. you need to set it to 12 or 16 to really start seeing the difference. Robot4JS, QT animation ( needed to install QT onto machine, DUH! ) : 19 min 25 sec ran test 2nd time after clearing cache: 19:16 seemed like when I got 1/2way into this, the render got a lot slower. the first 1/2 it ran right through. GPU loads were averaging 65-75% Config : Win 7 Z800 12c (24VC) @2.67ghz Q4000 + C2075 S On Jun 8, 2012, at 1:35 PM, Robert W. Walker wrote: > http://www.teddygage.com/AEBENCHCS6/ > >> -------- Original Message -------- >> Subject: Re: [AE] Why a raytraced renderer? >> From: Steve Oakley <steveo@practicali.com> >> Date: Fri, June 08, 2012 2:32 pm >> To: "After Effects Mail List" <AE-List@media-motion.tv> >> >> >> can you send me a link to the project... >> >> S >> >> >> On Jun 8, 2012, at 11:16 AM, rendernyc wrote: >> >>> if ANYONE has one of the cards tested already or a different one and wouldnt mind popping off a render please email me so we can get more results >>> >>> danny >>> >>> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 12:06 PM, Andrew Embury <aembury@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Fantastic! >>> >>> Thank you ever so much for doing this. This is truly phenomenal of the user group to come together to make this all possible. >>> >>> Cheers. >>> >>> - Andrew >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 11:59 AM, rendernyc <rendernyc@gmail.com> wrote: >>> The 480 uses more power than the 5XX >>> im expecting the 570 to be about the same speed as the 480 while using less power >>> >>> waiting for some tests on that one >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 11:57 AM, rendernyc <rendernyc@gmail.com> wrote: >>> we had the 580 at 15:07 >>> so 480 was about 8% slower >>> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Andrew Embury <aembury@gmail.com> wrote: >>> For the performance to cost ratio....WOW! That's phenomenal! >>> >>> Now, the 580 is cutting that time by 3 minutes is that correct? >>> >>> Cheers. >>> >>> - Andrew >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 11:36 AM, rendernyc <rendernyc@gmail.com> wrote: >>> 480 in a 12 core macpro was 16:21 >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Andrew Embury <aembury@gmail.com> wrote: >>> What about the 480? Did that not score between the 580 and 680? >>> >>> I'd be very interested to see that. >>> >>> Cheers. >>> >>> - Andrew >>> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 11:28 AM, rendernyc <rendernyc@gmail.com> wrote: >>> interesting >>> thats why we need more results... >>> >>> the 680 tested in a z800 rendered in 17:34 >>> a 580 in an 2008 mac pro was 15:07 >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Teddy Gage <teddygage@gmail.com> wrote: >>> GTX 680 - 2 GB VRAM - clock speed 1096 MHZ >>> >>> core i7 3930K (6 logical cores) overclocked to 4.7 gHZ >>> >>> render time : 13 min 5 seconds = 780 seconds >>> >>> >>> GTX 580 - 3 GB VRAM - clock speed 866 MHZ >>> >>> core i7 940 (4 cores) oc'd to 3.7 gHZ >>> >>> render time 13 min 50 seconds = 830 seconds >>> >>> >>> So these results seem to imply there is a disk and / or CPU bottleneck in your benchmark project, or there is something else going on. Maybe RAM plays a factor. Because in my own benchmark tests with a different project, I get different results, where the GTX 580 is faster, not the 680 in the faster machine. Interesting... >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 11:07 AM, rendernyc <rendernyc@gmail.com> wrote: >>> email sent >>> >>> thanks >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 10:26 AM, Dave Bittner <dave@pixelworkshop.com> wrote: >>> I'm running a flashed 470 from eBay. I'll run the test and send you the results. >>> >>> On Jun 7, 2012, at 5:41PM, rendernyc wrote: >>> >>>> yup, been testing lots of diff cards with the raytracer. >>>> want to run a test on your 570 for the chart? >>>> >>>> have the 285, 480, 580, 680, q4000 and q4800 so far >>>> >>>> was just saying that the only card someone from adobe could "officially" talk about is the currently shipping q4000 >>> >>> >>> +---End of message---+ >>> To unsubscribe send any message to <ae-list-off@media-motion.tv> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> danny princz >>> >>> exposedideas.com >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Animator & Editor >>> www.teddygage.com >>> Brooklyn >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> danny princz >>> >>> exposedideas.com >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> danny princz >>> >>> exposedideas.com >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> danny princz >>> >>> exposedideas.com >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> danny princz >>> >>> exposedideas.com >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> danny princz >>> >>> exposedideas.com > > > +---End of message---+ > To unsubscribe send any message to <ae-list-off@media-motion.tv> |
