>> can you send me a link to the project...
>>
>> S
>>
>>
>> On Jun 8, 2012, at 11:16 AM, rendernyc wrote:
>>
>>> if ANYONE has one of the cards tested already or a different one and wouldnt mind popping off a render please email me so we can get more results
>>>
>>> danny
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 12:06 PM, Andrew Embury <
aembury@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Fantastic!
>>>
>>> Thank you ever so much for doing this. This is truly phenomenal of the user group to come together to make this all possible.
>>>
>>> Cheers.
>>>
>>> - Andrew
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 11:59 AM, rendernyc <
rendernyc@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> The 480 uses more power than the 5XX
>>> im expecting the 570 to be about the same speed as the 480 while using less power
>>>
>>> waiting for some tests on that one
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 11:57 AM, rendernyc <
rendernyc@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> we had the 580 at 15:07
>>> so 480 was about 8% slower
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Andrew Embury <
aembury@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> For the performance to cost ratio....WOW! That's phenomenal!
>>>
>>> Now, the 580 is cutting that time by 3 minutes is that correct?
>>>
>>> Cheers.
>>>
>>> - Andrew
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 11:36 AM, rendernyc <
rendernyc@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 480 in a 12 core macpro was 16:21
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Andrew Embury <
aembury@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> What about the 480? Did that not score between the 580 and 680?
>>>
>>> I'd be very interested to see that.
>>>
>>> Cheers.
>>>
>>> - Andrew
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 11:28 AM, rendernyc <
rendernyc@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> interesting
>>> thats why we need more results...
>>>
>>> the 680 tested in a z800 rendered in 17:34
>>> a 580 in an 2008 mac pro was 15:07
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Teddy Gage <
teddygage@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> GTX 680 - 2 GB VRAM - clock speed 1096 MHZ
>>>
>>> core i7 3930K (6 logical cores) overclocked to 4.7 gHZ
>>>
>>> render time : 13 min 5 seconds = 780 seconds
>>>
>>>
>>> GTX 580 - 3 GB VRAM - clock speed 866 MHZ
>>>
>>> core i7 940 (4 cores) oc'd to 3.7 gHZ
>>>
>>> render time 13 min 50 seconds = 830 seconds
>>>
>>>
>>> So these results seem to imply there is a disk and / or CPU bottleneck in your benchmark project, or there is something else going on. Maybe RAM plays a factor. Because in my own benchmark tests with a different project, I get different results, where the GTX 580 is faster, not the 680 in the faster machine. Interesting...
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 11:07 AM, rendernyc <
rendernyc@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> email sent
>>>
>>> thanks
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 10:26 AM, Dave Bittner <
dave@pixelworkshop.com> wrote:
>>> I'm running a flashed 470 from eBay. I'll run the test and send you the results.
>>>
>>> On Jun 7, 2012, at 5:41PM, rendernyc wrote:
>>>
>>>> yup, been testing lots of diff cards with the raytracer.
>>>> want to run a test on your 570 for the chart?
>>>>
>>>> have the 285, 480, 580, 680, q4000 and q4800 so far
>>>>
>>>> was just saying that the only card someone from adobe could "officially" talk about is the currently shipping q4000
>>>
>>>
